Are scientists barking up the wrong tree to “scientifically validate” traditional medicines?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Maharaj, Vinesh J.
dc.contributor.author Naidoo-Maharaj, D.
dc.contributor.author Fouche, Gerda
dc.contributor.author Mianda, Sephora Mutombo
dc.date.accessioned 2019-07-09T12:22:01Z
dc.date.issued 2019-11
dc.description.abstract In South Africa it is estimated that at least 70% of South Africans consult one of the more than 200,000 Traditional Healers in the country. Clearly traditional health practitioners in South Africa play a crucial role in providing primary health care to the majority of the population. This knowledge system together with South Africa's unique biodiversity provides valuable resources for scientists to undertake research in search of new pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals and cosmeceuticals. Scientists often refer to this as “scientific validation of traditional medicines” which can be misleading to holders of the traditional knowledge since traditional health practitioners treat their patients holistically using traditional medicines consisting of one or more plant species. Four case studies i.e. appetite suppressant form Hoodia gordonii, monatin from Sclerochiton ilicifolius, mosquito repellent from Lippia javanica and the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) and male pattern baldness from Elephantorrhiza elephantina which were either commercialized or close to commercialization are described and in all cases these have followed the classical drug discovery or product development route. These case studies have led to the realization that the traditional use of the plants were not exactly the same as the commercialized use. Often the scientists select plants based on traditional use and through scientific intervention discover similar biological activities or different biological activities of the plant species or constituents thereof. The scientific discoveries are further developed and the route to commercialization requires huge investment, time and resources. Hence it could be concluded that the approach has not been to scientifically validate the traditional uses of plants or traditional medicines. As scientists we need to be responsible when utilizing traditional knowledge in our research approaches and it is important to share benefits with the owners of indigenous knowledge. en_ZA
dc.description.department Chemistry en_ZA
dc.description.embargo 2020-11-01
dc.description.librarian hj2019 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship The CSIR en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.elsevier.com/locate/sajb en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Maharaj, V.J., Naidoo-Maharaj, D., Fouche, G. et al. 2019, 'Are scientists barking up the wrong tree to “scientifically validate” traditional medicines?', South African Journal of Botany, vol. 126, pp. 58-64. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 0254-6299 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1727-9321 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1016/j.sajb.2019.06.010
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/70637
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Elsevier en_ZA
dc.rights © 2019 SAAB. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in South African Journal of Botany. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. A definitive version was subsequently published in South African Journal of Botany, vol. 126, pp. 58-64, 2019. doi : 10.1016/j.sajb.2019.06.010. en_ZA
dc.subject Appetite suppressant en_ZA
dc.subject Monatin en_ZA
dc.subject Mosquito repellent en_ZA
dc.subject Scientific validation en_ZA
dc.subject Sweetener en_ZA
dc.subject Traditional medicines en_ZA
dc.subject Benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) en_ZA
dc.subject Elephantorrhiza elephantina (Elandsboontjie) en_ZA
dc.subject Lippia javanica (Fever tree) en_ZA
dc.subject Sclerochiton ilicifolius (Molomo monate) en_ZA
dc.subject Hoodia gordonii (Ghaap) en_ZA
dc.title Are scientists barking up the wrong tree to “scientifically validate” traditional medicines? en_ZA
dc.type Postprint Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record