Abstract:
Background: Chronic and persistent infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most
important factor associated with the development of cervical cancer. Cervical cancer deaths
have been on the rise in recent years with 85% of about 270 000 annual deaths occurring in
developing countries. The rise in cervical cancer trends in the past two decades has coincided
with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic especially in the sub-Saharan African
region. With the advent of HIV especially among young people in most of these developing
countries, the incidence, morbidity and burden of cervical cancer are likely to continue
increasing.
Although cervical cancer prevention/screening and treatment is available in most developing
countries, challenges and constraints still exist when it comes to HIV-positive women. Most
developing countries, Zimbabwe included, do not have adequate infrastructure, funds, human
resources, proper guidelines, and policies, which facilitate the adoption of effective prevention
and treatment methods for cervical cancer among HIV-positive women. Therefore, the first
part of this study involved two systematic reviews to weigh current evidence on screening and
treatment of cervical cancer in HIV-seropositive women. In addition to the burden in HIVpositive
women, the rise in HIV-incidence and risky sexual behaviour (multiple sexual
partners, early sexual debut and use of contraceptives) among young people (15 to 24 years
old), pose as barriers to successful establishment and implementation of cervical cancer control
initiatives.
In Zimbabwe, there is underutilisation of available cervical cancer services (although some are
expensive) due to lack of knowledge and information about cervical cancer, a patriarchal and
conservative society that views cervical cancer as a women’s issue. Adding to these issues,
Zimbabwe does not have a cancer communication strategy that focuses on cancer risks factors
as a cancer primary prevention. The National Cancer Prevention and Control Strategy for Zimbabwe (2014-2018) highlighted that underfunding has resulted in health education on
cervical cancer to be unstructured. Therefore, as Zimbabwe sets out to strengthen cervical
cancer prevention with the launch of the National Mass HPV Vaccination drive in May 2018,
a number of questions still exists; how can a culturally patriarchal society aid and accept
vaccination freely? How can young boys, men and the rest of the community be integrated
within cervical cancer prevention programmes? Are there opportunities for HIV-positive
women in these initiatives? How can the issue of health inequity which is associated with
cervical cancer incidence be addressed?
Aim: This PhD study weighed current evidence on screening and treatment of cervical cancer
in HIV-seropositive women in developing countries through two systematic reviews; and
assessed the knowledge, attitude and practices of young people towards cervical cancer,
prevention/screening, HPV and vaccination.
Methods: The research design was an integrative approach, which utilised a combination of
two systematic reviews and a cross-sectional survey. The two systematic reviews explored
cervical cancer prevention and treatment modalities for HIV-positive women, whilst the crosssectional
survey assessed young people’s knowledge, attitude and practices concerning
cervical cancer. Study participants for the cross-sectional survey were recruited through a
three-stage cluster design from high schools and universities in Zimbabwe. Knowledge,
attitudes and practices were assessed using questions based and adapted from the concepts of
the Health Belief Model (HBM) and the Cervical Cancer Measuring tool kit-United Kingdom
(UK).
Results: The study found that HPV Deoxyribonucleic acid/Messenger RNA (DNA/mRNA)
testing (n=16, 64.0%), visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) (n=13, 52.0%) and Pap smear
(n=11, 44.0%) are the mostly used cervical cancer screening methods. HPV testing has a better accuracy/efficiency than other methods with a sensitivity of between 80.0-97.0% and
specificity of 51.0-78.0%. In addition, the study found that sequential screening using VIA or
visual inspection with Lugol’s iodine (VILI) and HPV testing has shown better clinical
performance in screening HIV-seropositive women. Whilst radiation, chemotherapy,
chemoradiation, and surgery have shown the possibility of effectiveness among HIVseropositive
women, cervical cancer stage, immunosuppressive level, and multisystem
toxicities due to treatment are associated with treatment completion, prognosis and survival
outcomes. Those infected with HIV are of a younger age and have more advanced cervical
cancer as compared to those who are HIV-negative. The majority of young people, 87.47%
(656/750), claimed to know what cervical cancer is. However, only 43.14% (324/751) had ever
heard of cervical cancer prevention/screening and 53% (398/751) did not know about HPVhow
it is transmitted or prevented. Misconceptions regarding cervical cancer causes exist, with
some young people attributing cervical cancer to use of detergents, certain foodstuffs and
having sex with an uncircumcised man.
Conclusion and Recommendations: This research not only reports on the current screening
and treatment modalities for cervical cancer among HIV-positive women, but it also offers a
lens through which government can generate behavioural changes around cervical cancer
among young people. Although cervical cancer screening exists in almost all developing
countries, what is missing is both opportunistic and systematic organized population-based
screening. Cervical cancer screening programmes need to be integrated into already existing
HIV services, to enable early detection and treatment. The study suggests a need to offer
opportunistic and coordinated screening programmes that are provider-initiated to young
women (from 15 years), especially those who are HIV-infected, to promote early identification
of cervical precancerous lesions. Opportunities to include young boys and HIV-positive
middle-aged women in the recently launched mass HPV vaccination programmes exist and can be utilised. Ring-fencing budgets or introducing cancer levies and investing resources in
evidence-based screen and treat strategies for precancerous lesions in HIV-seropositive women
and young people will reduce morbidity and mortality due to cervical cancer. Developing a
standard cervical cancer primary prevention tool that can be integrated into schools can be a
step towards addressing health inequity. Research on cervical cancer management of HIVseropositive
patients focusing on the quality of life of those treated, the effectiveness of the
treatment method taking into account CD4+ count and ART is required.