dc.contributor.author |
Vogel, John T.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Somers, Michael J.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Venter, Jan A.
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2019-04-01T12:12:48Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2019-04-01T12:12:48Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2018 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Restoring large predators to small confined areas (< 400 km2) is inherently complex and therefore any data on the foraging
behaviour and top–down influences hold significant value for the conservation and reintroduction planning of the species.
Conservation efforts are increasingly applied to small or fragmented landscapes. However, it is unclear what the effect
of these small areas have on processes such as foraging behaviour as these spatial constraints may reduce the likelihood
of innate predator–prey dynamics. We investigated African wild dog Lycaon pictus foraging patterns on five small fenced
protected areas in South Africa. We report on the diet composition, prey preferences and potential influence of pack size
and fences on the diet of African wild dogs. Data from 553 kills collected by direct observations at the five sample sites
were analysed. Sixteen species of prey were recorded. A narrow dietary niche breadth was determined. Impala Aepyceros
melampus and nyala Tragelaphus angasii collectively, form 75% of diet, and 67% of edible biomass. However, only nyala
were significantly selected for. The mean wild dog pack sizes in our sample sites were relatively smaller than those frequently
encountered in larger systems. We found that larger wild dog pack sizes did not select for larger prey. Contrary to studies
investigating the influence of hard boundaries on smaller protected areas, the upward bias caused by fences on prey mass
selection was inconsistent across sample sites. By characterising African wild dog diet on smaller protected areas, our results
are suggestive of potential top–down influences that should be investigated by future studies. The results add to a growing
body of literature that aims to assist in the reintroduction planning of endangered carnivore species. |
en_ZA |
dc.description.department |
Centre for Wildlife Management |
en_ZA |
dc.description.librarian |
am2019 |
en_ZA |
dc.description.uri |
http://www.wildlifebiology.org |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation |
Vogel, J.T., Somers, M.J. & Venter, J.A. 2018, 'The foraging ecology of reintroduced African wild dog in small
protected areas', Wildlife Biology, vol. 2018, no, 1, pp. 1-10. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn |
0909-6396 (print) |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1903-220X (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.2981/wlb.00424 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/68736 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_ZA |
dc.publisher |
Nordic Council for Wildlife Research |
en_ZA |
dc.rights |
© 2018 The Authors. This is an Open Access article. |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Foraging |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Predators |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Conservation |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Kruger National Park (KNP) |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Kruger National Park (South Africa) |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Prey selection |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Carrying capacity |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Large predators |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Lion (Panthera leo) |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Diet |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Wildebeest |
en_ZA |
dc.title |
The foraging ecology of reintroduced African wild dog in small protected areas |
en_ZA |
dc.type |
Article |
en_ZA |