dc.contributor.author |
Humbert, Fabien
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
De Kock, Michiel O.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Altermann, Wladyslaw
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Elburg, Marlina A.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Lenhardt, Nils
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Smith, Albertus J.B.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Masango, Samson Motlagomang
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2018-09-25T07:02:51Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2018-09 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The ∼2.23 Ga Hekpoort Formation (Transvaal sub-basin) and the ∼2.43 Ga Ongeluk Formation (Griqualand West sub-basin) represent voluminous Paleoproterozoic igneous events on the Kaapvaal craton of South Africa that predate the emplacement of the ∼2.055 Ga Bushveld Complex, and probably covered most of the craton at the time of their extrusion. In this contribution, we present field, petrological and geochemical studies of the Hekpoort Formation and compare it with the Ongeluk Formation. The Hekpoort Formation consists of a thick subaerial volcanic sequence in which volcanoclastic rocks occur mainly at the base. Rare, localized hyaloclastites and variolitic rocks record the presence of ponded water, while interbedded sedimentary rocks and paleo-weathered flow tops suggest prolonged time-breaks in volcanic activity. The Hekpoort rocks underwent metamorphism up to greenschist facies but also episodes of metasomatism and silicification. Preserved primary magmatic minerals are clinopyroxene (pigeonite, augite and diopside), and rarely plagioclase (labradorite). Both the variable whole rock Mg# (evolving from 69 to 50) and the changes in clinopyroxene composition attest to magmatic fractionation. Lava units of both the Hekpoort and Ongeluk formations are mostly basalts, with silicification responsible for increased SiO2 contents. Lava units of both formations also display remarkably similar trace elements patterns, which is noteworthy for units separated by 200 million years, and unique among the Precambrian mafic magmatic units of the Kaapvaal craton that we evaluated.
Similar to other Precambrian mafic magmatic units of the Kaapvaal craton, the Hekpoort Formation shows an arc-like trace element signature, mainly represented by negative Nb-Ta anomalies (in normalized trace element patterns). The Hekpoort (and Ongeluk), together with three other Paleoproterozoic mafic units of the craton older than 2.2 Ga, exhibit relatively high contents of Th and U, which sharply contrasts with Archean units. The data suggest that a subduction process marked the Archean-Proterozoic boundary on the Kaapvaal craton. |
en_ZA |
dc.description.department |
Geology |
en_ZA |
dc.description.embargo |
2019-09-01 |
|
dc.description.librarian |
hj2018 |
en_ZA |
dc.description.sponsorship |
Grants from South African Department of Science and Technology and the National Research Foundation (DST-NRF)–funded Centre of Excellence for Integrated Mineral and Energy Resource Analysis (CIMERA). Funding to Wladyslaw Altermann for fieldwork by the team of the University of Pretoria (UP) was from the NRF incentive funding for rated researchers and by the Kumba-Exxaro Chair at UP. |
en_ZA |
dc.description.uri |
http://www.elsevier.com/locate/precamres |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation |
Humbert, F., De Kock, M.O., Altermann, W. et al. 2018, 'Petrology, physical volcanology and geochemistry of a Paleoproterozoic large igneous province : the Hekpoort Formation in the southern Transvaal sub-basin (Kaapvaal craton)', Precambrian Research, vol. 315, pp. 232-256. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn |
0301-9268 (print) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.1016/j.precamres.2018.07.022 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/66634 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_ZA |
dc.publisher |
Elsevier |
en_ZA |
dc.rights |
© 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Precambrian Research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. A definitive version was subsequently published in Precambrian Research, vol. 315, pp. 232-256, 2018. doi : 10.1016/j.precamres.2018.07.022. |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Hekpoort formation |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Kaapvaal craton |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Geochemistry |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Ongeluk formation |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Large igneous province |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Archean-Proterozoic boundary |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Paleoproterozoic within-craton volcanism |
en_ZA |
dc.title |
Petrology, physical volcanology and geochemistry of a Paleoproterozoic large igneous province : the Hekpoort Formation in the southern Transvaal sub-basin (Kaapvaal craton) |
en_ZA |
dc.type |
Postprint Article |
en_ZA |