Petrology, physical volcanology and geochemistry of a Paleoproterozoic large igneous province : the Hekpoort Formation in the southern Transvaal sub-basin (Kaapvaal craton)

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Humbert, Fabien
dc.contributor.author De Kock, Michiel O.
dc.contributor.author Altermann, Wladyslaw
dc.contributor.author Elburg, Marlina A.
dc.contributor.author Lenhardt, Nils
dc.contributor.author Smith, Albertus J.B.
dc.contributor.author Masango, Samson Motlagomang
dc.date.accessioned 2018-09-25T07:02:51Z
dc.date.issued 2018-09
dc.description.abstract The ∼2.23 Ga Hekpoort Formation (Transvaal sub-basin) and the ∼2.43 Ga Ongeluk Formation (Griqualand West sub-basin) represent voluminous Paleoproterozoic igneous events on the Kaapvaal craton of South Africa that predate the emplacement of the ∼2.055 Ga Bushveld Complex, and probably covered most of the craton at the time of their extrusion. In this contribution, we present field, petrological and geochemical studies of the Hekpoort Formation and compare it with the Ongeluk Formation. The Hekpoort Formation consists of a thick subaerial volcanic sequence in which volcanoclastic rocks occur mainly at the base. Rare, localized hyaloclastites and variolitic rocks record the presence of ponded water, while interbedded sedimentary rocks and paleo-weathered flow tops suggest prolonged time-breaks in volcanic activity. The Hekpoort rocks underwent metamorphism up to greenschist facies but also episodes of metasomatism and silicification. Preserved primary magmatic minerals are clinopyroxene (pigeonite, augite and diopside), and rarely plagioclase (labradorite). Both the variable whole rock Mg# (evolving from 69 to 50) and the changes in clinopyroxene composition attest to magmatic fractionation. Lava units of both the Hekpoort and Ongeluk formations are mostly basalts, with silicification responsible for increased SiO2 contents. Lava units of both formations also display remarkably similar trace elements patterns, which is noteworthy for units separated by 200 million years, and unique among the Precambrian mafic magmatic units of the Kaapvaal craton that we evaluated. Similar to other Precambrian mafic magmatic units of the Kaapvaal craton, the Hekpoort Formation shows an arc-like trace element signature, mainly represented by negative Nb-Ta anomalies (in normalized trace element patterns). The Hekpoort (and Ongeluk), together with three other Paleoproterozoic mafic units of the craton older than 2.2 Ga, exhibit relatively high contents of Th and U, which sharply contrasts with Archean units. The data suggest that a subduction process marked the Archean-Proterozoic boundary on the Kaapvaal craton. en_ZA
dc.description.department Geology en_ZA
dc.description.embargo 2019-09-01
dc.description.librarian hj2018 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship Grants from South African Department of Science and Technology and the National Research Foundation (DST-NRF)–funded Centre of Excellence for Integrated Mineral and Energy Resource Analysis (CIMERA). Funding to Wladyslaw Altermann for fieldwork by the team of the University of Pretoria (UP) was from the NRF incentive funding for rated researchers and by the Kumba-Exxaro Chair at UP. en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.elsevier.com/locate/precamres en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Humbert, F., De Kock, M.O., Altermann, W. et al. 2018, 'Petrology, physical volcanology and geochemistry of a Paleoproterozoic large igneous province : the Hekpoort Formation in the southern Transvaal sub-basin (Kaapvaal craton)', Precambrian Research, vol. 315, pp. 232-256. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 0301-9268 (print)
dc.identifier.other 10.1016/j.precamres.2018.07.022
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/66634
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Elsevier en_ZA
dc.rights © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Precambrian Research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. A definitive version was subsequently published in Precambrian Research, vol. 315, pp. 232-256, 2018. doi : 10.1016/j.precamres.2018.07.022. en_ZA
dc.subject Hekpoort formation en_ZA
dc.subject Kaapvaal craton en_ZA
dc.subject Geochemistry en_ZA
dc.subject Ongeluk formation en_ZA
dc.subject Large igneous province en_ZA
dc.subject Archean-Proterozoic boundary en_ZA
dc.subject Paleoproterozoic within-craton volcanism en_ZA
dc.title Petrology, physical volcanology and geochemistry of a Paleoproterozoic large igneous province : the Hekpoort Formation in the southern Transvaal sub-basin (Kaapvaal craton) en_ZA
dc.type Postprint Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record