Abstract:
Alexander Schweizer propagated the thesis that predestination is a central theme of Calvin’s
theology and that later Calvinism had to defend his teaching as the distinguishing point
between the Lutheran and reformed traditions. In this article it is shown that election is also an
important element of Luther’s theology. The historic development of the two reformers’
thinking about election is presented. In spite of different nuances, the difference between the
two are minimal. The main reason why the differences could be underplayed is because it is
shown that Calvin’s thesis of ‘double predestination’ only forms one part of Calvin’s doctrinal
thinking on this subject. Calvin has actually two sets of statements on predestination. When
the unacceptable statements about ‘double predestination’ are not emphasised, but rather his
early works and sermons, he and Luther share the same opinions on election in Christ through
grace. Both of them understand election as the final word on justification.
