Monitoring of unconventional oil and gas extraction and its policy implications : a case study from South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Esterhuyse, Surina
dc.contributor.author Avenant, Marinda
dc.contributor.author Redelinghuys, Nola
dc.contributor.author Kijko, Andrzej
dc.contributor.author Glazewski, Jan
dc.contributor.author Plit, Lisa
dc.contributor.author Kemp, Marthie
dc.contributor.author Smit, Ansie
dc.contributor.author Vos, A. Tascha
dc.date.accessioned 2018-08-21T12:58:08Z
dc.date.issued 2018-07
dc.description.abstract Biophysical and socio-economic monitoring during unconventional oil and gas (UOG) extraction is important to assess change and to have reference conditions against which to identify UOG extraction activity impacts. The large-scale cumulative impacts of UOG extraction makes standardised monitoring across geographic and socio-political regions important. This article emphasises the importance of a robust monitoring framework that must serve as a guideline for planning monitoring activities during UOG extraction. A case study from South Africa is presented to illustrate important aspects to address during the development of a UOG extraction monitoring framework. The South African case is critically assessed and resultant policy implications are discussed. Important policy considerations include performing baseline monitoring during UOG extraction, performing UOG extraction monitoring in an integrated, systematic, and standardised manner, ensuring that proper resources are available to perform the monitoring and implementing an adaptive management plan that is linked to UOG extraction monitoring en_ZA
dc.description.department Geology en_ZA
dc.description.embargo 2019-07-01
dc.description.librarian hj2018 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship The Water Research Commission , South Africa en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Esterhuyse, S., Avenant, M., Redelinghuys, N. et al. 2018, 'Monitoring of unconventional oil and gas extraction and its policy implications : a case study from South Africa', Energy Policy, vo. 118, pp. 109-120. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 0301-4215 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1873-6777 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.001
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/66304
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Elsevier en_ZA
dc.rights © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Energy Policy. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. A definitive version was subsequently published in Energy Policy, vol. 118, pp. 109-120, 2018. doi : 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.001. en_ZA
dc.subject Unconventional oil and gas (UOG) en_ZA
dc.subject Biophysical en_ZA
dc.subject Socio-economic en_ZA
dc.subject Monitoring en_ZA
dc.subject Framework en_ZA
dc.subject Policy development en_ZA
dc.subject South Africa (SA) en_ZA
dc.subject Australia en_ZA
dc.subject Investment en_ZA
dc.subject Dimensions en_ZA
dc.subject Fracking en_ZA
dc.subject Pennsylvania en_ZA
dc.subject Management en_ZA
dc.subject Impacts en_ZA
dc.subject United States (US) en_ZA
dc.subject Cumulative effects assessment en_ZA
dc.subject Corporate social responsibility (CSR) en_ZA
dc.title Monitoring of unconventional oil and gas extraction and its policy implications : a case study from South Africa en_ZA
dc.type Postprint Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record