PIRLS Literacy 2016 : South African Highlights Report (Grade 4)

Show simple item record

dc.contributor celeste.combrinck@up.ac.za en_ZA
dc.contributor.author Howie, Sarah J.
dc.contributor.author Combrinck, Celeste
dc.contributor.author Roux, Karen
dc.contributor.author Tshele, Mishack
dc.contributor.author Mokoena, Gabriel
dc.contributor.author McLeod Palane, Nelladee
dc.date.accessioned 2018-08-17T06:58:09Z
dc.date.available 2018-08-17T06:58:09Z
dc.date.created 2017
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.description PIRLS Literacy 2016: South African Highlights Report Grade 4 en_ZA
dc.description.abstract How well do South African Grade 4 learners read when compared internationally and locally in the 11 official languages? Can Grade 4 learners read for meaning by the end of their scholastic year? These are but some of the many critical questions the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) aimed to answer when South Africa participated in the 2016 round. The PIRLS Literacy assessment contains easier passages and questions when compared to the standard PIRLS assessment. Due to the low South African achievement in previous rounds of participation, South Africa opted to participate in PIRLS Literacy at Grade 4 level in the 2011 and 2016 cycles. Despite the fact that the South African Grade 4 learners wrote easier passages than most of their international counterparts, South Africa was the lowest performing country out of 50 and was on average 6 schooling years behind the top performing countries. South Africa participated at a national level, and Grade 4 samples were drawn to represent all 11 languages and the nine provinces. The highlight report includes comparisons between the 2011 and 2016 cycles as well as international reading literacy benchmarks reached. The report concludes that South Africa faces many challenges when developing reading literacy at Grade 4 level. Findings include that learners who attended schools in rural areas and townships and were taught in the African languages in Foundation Phase tend to have lower reading literacy comprehension when compared to other learners in the study. Boys also emerged as a vulnerable group who need additional assistance as they have significantly lower reading literacy achievement when compared with girls. en_ZA
dc.format.extent 12 Pages en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Howie, S.J., Combrinck, C., Roux, K., Tshele, M., Mokoena, G.M., & McLeod Palane, N. (2017). PIRLS LITERACY 2016: South African Highlights Report. Pretoria: Centre for Evaluation and Assessment. en_ZA
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/66185
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Centre for Evaluation and Assessment (CEA) en_ZA
dc.rights © 2018 Centre for Evaluation and Assessment, Faculty of Education, University of Pretoria en_ZA
dc.subject PIRLS en_ZA
dc.subject PIRLS Literacy en_ZA
dc.subject South African Highlights Report en_ZA
dc.subject Grade 4 en_ZA
dc.title PIRLS Literacy 2016 : South African Highlights Report (Grade 4) en_ZA
dc.type Technical Report en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record