We are excited to announce that the repository will soon undergo an upgrade, featuring a new look and feel along with several enhanced features to improve your experience. Please be on the lookout for further updates and announcements regarding the launch date. We appreciate your support and look forward to unveiling the improved platform soon.
dc.contributor.author | Bhorat, Ismail![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Chauke, Lawrence![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Coetzee, Edward![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Geerts, Lut![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Lombaard, Hennie![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Nicolaou, Ermos![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Pistorius, Lou![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Soma-Pillay, Priya![]() |
|
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-05-28T09:16:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-05-28T09:16:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.description.abstract | Prenatal genetic screening is an integral part of general antenatal care and is regarded as standard of care for all pregnant women. All pregnant women < 20 weeks gestation should be offered some form of genetic screening and this should be discussed in an extensive pre-test counselling session. Late screening (after 20 weeks) may also be offered but will be limited by management options. Cell-free DNA testing has added another dimension to the landscape of prenatal screening but has to be appropriately used for the correct indication. Interpretation of risk for Down’s syndrome is a critical component of the screening process. A guideline would be to regard screening risks in absolute terms as there is no provision made to interpret risk in relative risk terms. An important safeguard to overcome the “relative risk” conundrum would be to inform all patients during pre-test counselling of an intermediate risk category generally between 1:300-1:1000 where cfDNA testing may be considered, at the parents’ own discretion. If the screening risk is <1:1000, no further testing is advised as this risk is deemed very low. A screening risk for Down’s syndrome >1:300 will be deemed high risk, as is presently the case. | en_ZA |
dc.description.department | Obstetrics and Gynaecology | en_ZA |
dc.description.librarian | am2018 | en_ZA |
dc.description.uri | http://www.journals.co.za/content/journal/medog | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation | Bhorat, I., Chauke, L., Coetzee, E. et al. 2018, 'Challenges and controversies in prenatal genetic screening in the South African context', Obstetrics and Gynaecology Forum, 28, no. 1, pp. 33-36. | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn | 1027-9148 (print) | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/65033 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_ZA |
dc.publisher | In House Publications | en_ZA |
dc.rights | In House Publications | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Screening risks | en_ZA |
dc.subject | DNA testing | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Antenatal care (ANC) | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Pregnant women | en_ZA |
dc.title | Challenges and controversies in prenatal genetic screening in the South African context | en_ZA |
dc.type | Article | en_ZA |