dc.contributor.author |
Versfeld, Anna
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Scheibe, Andrew
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Shelly, Shaun
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Wildschutd, Janine
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2018-05-21T07:53:37Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2018-04 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The importance of community involvement in public health research processes is well established. The literature is, however, less forthcoming about processes of community inclusion in public health project implementation, especially when it comes to projects focusing on key populations. The Step Up Project is the first multi-city harm reduction service provision project for people who inject drugs in South Africa. Since inception, the Project has made concerted efforts to work with and alongside people who actively identify as people who inject drugs. This paper outlines two features in relation to project-beneficiary dynamics that emerged in a qualitative project evaluation conducted by an external researcher and a funder representative. The first was that people accessing the project comfortably expressed criticisms of both themselves and the project, and noted when their behaviour contradicted project ideals. The second was the extent to which engagement with the project was reported to be fostering a renewed sense of personhood and right to exist in the world. These findings are, we suggest, in principle related to two forms of community engagement: consistent empathic response and community advisory groups. This implies that programmes need to focus on their mode of approach as much as on the content of their approach. It further implies that programme impact not be limited to quantitative assessment measures. |
en_ZA |
dc.description.department |
Family Medicine |
en_ZA |
dc.description.embargo |
2019-04-27 |
|
dc.description.librarian |
hj2018 |
en_ZA |
dc.description.sponsorship |
The United States Centres of Disease Control and Prevention [grant number NU2GGH000257] and Mainline [grant number 15.08.03.MLN.026], [grant number BtG2 MLN PC 001]. |
en_ZA |
dc.description.uri |
https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/ccph20 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation |
Anna Versfeld, Andrew Scheibe, Shaun Shelly & Janine Wildschut (2018) Empathic response and no need for perfection: reflections on harm reduction engagement in South Africa, Critical Public Health, 28:3, 329-339, DOI: 10.1080/09581596.2018.1443204. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn |
0958-1596 (print) |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1469-3682 (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.1080/09581596.2018.1443204 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/64986 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_ZA |
dc.publisher |
Taylor and Francis |
en_ZA |
dc.rights |
© 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an electronic version of an article published in Critical Public Health, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 329-339, 2018. doi : 10.1080/09581596.2018.1443204. Critical Public Health is available online at : https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/ccph20. |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
People who inject drugs |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Community advisory groups |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Empathic response |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
South Africa (SA) |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Harm Reduction |
|
dc.subject |
Substance Use Disorders |
|
dc.subject |
Health Care Engagement |
|
dc.subject |
Mental Health |
|
dc.subject |
Health Inequalities |
|
dc.subject |
Community Health Services |
|
dc.subject |
Public Health |
|
dc.subject |
Patient-Centered Care |
|
dc.subject |
Health Policy |
|
dc.subject |
Human Rights in Health Care |
|
dc.subject.other |
Health sciences articles SDG-03 |
|
dc.subject.other |
SDG-03: Good health and well-being |
|
dc.subject.other |
Health sciences articles SDG-16 |
|
dc.subject.other |
SDG-16: Peace, justice and strong institutions |
|
dc.title |
Empathic response and no need for perfection : reflections on harm reduction engagement in South Africa |
en_ZA |
dc.type |
Postprint Article |
en_ZA |