Are two teachers better than one?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Van Oordt, Marius Louis
dc.contributor.author Van Oordt, Theresa
dc.contributor.author Du Toit, Pieter Hertzog
dc.date.accessioned 2018-01-24T09:30:01Z
dc.date.available 2018-01-24T09:30:01Z
dc.date.issued 2014
dc.description.abstract PURPOSE – This paper aims to focus on the thinking styles of a group of Accounting students, and to determine whether team teaching by two criteria-specific lecturers can be an effective collaborative teaching approach to accommodate students’ diverse learning preferences. Research on thinking and learning processes led to a four-quadrant whole-brain model of people’s thinking styles and associated learning preferences. The model can be used to identify and accommodate students’ diverse thinking styles and learning preferences. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH – A case study approach was followed, using multiple data collection methods. The thinking styles of 288 students and two lecturers were surveyed using a thinking style questionnaire and the Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument. The results of the collaborative teaching approach were obtained by way of a survey questionnaire providing both quantitative and qualitative feedback, as well as a SWOT analysis completed by the involved lecturers. FINDINGS – The main results suggest that a collaborative teaching approach can address students’ diverse learning preferences, although some students may find constant switching between lecturers distracting. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS – The collaborative teaching approach in the teaching interaction cannot be isolated. Collaborative teaching was not repeated or extended due to resource constraints. ORIGINALLY/VALUE – Academics from all disciplines recognise a need for a teaching practice that addresses students’ diverse learning preferences. Hitherto, outside of special education, collaborative teaching has received little scholarly attention, especially as an approach to address tertiary students’ diverse learning preferences en_ZA
dc.description.department Humanities Education en_ZA
dc.description.department Taxation en_ZA
dc.description.librarian am2018 en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.emeraldinsight.com/2049-372X.htm en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation M.L. van Oordt, T. van Oordt, P. du Toit, (2014) "Are two teachers better than one?", Meditari Accountancy Research, Vol. 22 Issue: 2, pp.165-185, https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-01-2013-0003. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 2049-372X
dc.identifier.other 10.1108/MEDAR-01-2013-0003
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/63725
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Emerald en_ZA
dc.rights © Emerald Group Publishing Limited en_ZA
dc.subject Education en_ZA
dc.subject Collaborative teaching en_ZA
dc.subject Dual teaching en_ZA
dc.subject Herrmann en_ZA
dc.subject Learning preferences en_ZA
dc.subject Team teaching en_ZA
dc.subject Thinking styles en_ZA
dc.subject Whole-brain learning en_ZA
dc.subject Whole-brain model en_ZA
dc.title Are two teachers better than one? en_ZA
dc.type Postprint Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record