Normative versus actual methodologies in planning research : a hybrid picture

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Du Toit, Jacques Louis
dc.contributor.author Boshoff, Nelius
dc.contributor.author Mariette, Niclesse
dc.date.accessioned 2017-11-20T08:46:55Z
dc.date.available 2017-11-20T08:46:55Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.description.abstract What methodologies do we write about, and what type of research do we actually conduct and build upon in planning? Since the 1980s, planners have argued for more qualitative research within an interpretative paradigm. A content analysis of articles in Journal of Planning Education and Research do show a majority of qualitative studies, but cast within a pragmatic rather than an interpretative paradigm. More recently, planners have reiterated the need for qualitative research, especially participatory and applied forms of research within a critical social science paradigm. Some recommendations for planning education and research are discussed. en_ZA
dc.description.department Town and Regional Planning en_ZA
dc.description.librarian hj2017 en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://journals.sagepub.com/home/jpe en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Du Toit, J., Boshoff, N. & Mariette, N. 2017, 'Normative versus actual methodologies in planning research : a hybrid picture', Journal of Planning Education and Research, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 477-487. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 1552-6577 (online)
dc.identifier.issn 0739-456X (print)
dc.identifier.other 10.1177/0739456X16658095
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/63210
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Sage en_ZA
dc.rights © The Author(s) 2016 en_ZA
dc.subject Citation impact en_ZA
dc.subject Research methodology en_ZA
dc.subject Planning research en_ZA
dc.subject Planning education en_ZA
dc.title Normative versus actual methodologies in planning research : a hybrid picture en_ZA
dc.type Postprint Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record