A review of camera trapping for conservation behaviour research

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Caravaggi, Anthony
dc.contributor.author Banks, Peter B.
dc.contributor.author Burton, A. Cole
dc.contributor.author Finlay, Caroline M.V.
dc.contributor.author Hayward, Matt W.
dc.contributor.author Rowcliffe, Marcus J.
dc.contributor.author Wood, Mike D.
dc.date.accessioned 2017-10-25T06:28:04Z
dc.date.available 2017-10-25T06:28:04Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.description.abstract An understanding of animal behaviour is important if conservation initiatives are to be effective. However, quantifying the behaviour of wild animals presents significant challenges. Remote-sensing camera traps are becoming increasingly popular survey instruments that have been used to non-invasively study a variety of animal behaviours, yielding key insights into behavioural repertoires. They are well suited to ethological studies and provide considerable opportunities for generating conservation-relevant behavioural data if novel and robust methodological and analytical solutions can be developed. This paper reviews the current state of camera-trap-based ethological studies, describes new and emerging directions in camera-based conservation behaviour, and highlights a number of limitations and considerations of particular relevance for camerabased studies. Three promising areas of study are discussed: (1) documenting anthropogenic impacts on behaviour; (2) incorporating behavioural responses into management planning and (3) using behavioural indicators such as giving up densities and daily activity patterns. We emphasize the importance of reporting methodological details, utilizing emerging camera trap metadata standards and central data repositories for facilitating reproducibility, comparison and synthesis across studies. Behavioural studies using camera traps are in their infancy; the full potential of the technology is as yet unrealized. Researchers are encouraged to embrace conservation-driven hypotheses in order to meet future challenges and improve the efficacy of conservation and management processes. en_ZA
dc.description.department Centre for Wildlife Management en_ZA
dc.description.librarian am2017 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship The contribution of M.D. Wood was supported by the TREE project (www.ceh.ac. uk/TREE) funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), Environment Agency and Radioactive Waste Management Limited. The contributions of C.M.V. Finlay were supported by the Red Squirrels United project (http://www.redsquirrelsunited.org.uk/) funded by EU Life and Heritage Lottery Fund. en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2056-3485 en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Caravaggi, A., Banks, P.B., Burton, A.C., Finlay, C.M.V., Haswell, P.M., Hayward, M.W., Rowcliffe, M.J. & Wood, M.D. 2017, 'A review of camera trapping for conservation behaviour research', Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 109-122. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 2056-3485 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1002/rse2.48
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/62921
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Wiley Open Access en_ZA
dc.rights © 2017 The Authors. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Zoological Society of London. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License. en_ZA
dc.subject Anthropogenic impacts en_ZA
dc.subject Behavioural indicators en_ZA
dc.subject Ethology en_ZA
dc.subject Management en_ZA
dc.subject Monitoring en_ZA
dc.subject Remote sensing en_ZA
dc.title A review of camera trapping for conservation behaviour research en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record