We are excited to announce that the repository will soon undergo an upgrade, featuring a new look and feel along with several enhanced features to improve your experience. Please be on the lookout for further updates and announcements regarding the launch date. We appreciate your support and look forward to unveiling the improved platform soon.
dc.contributor.author | Tonini, S.![]() |
en |
dc.contributor.author | Cossali, G.E.![]() |
en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-08-28T07:08:28Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-28T07:08:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | en |
dc.description | Papers presented to the 12th International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics, Costa de Sol, Spain on 11-13 July 2016. | en |
dc.description.abstract | Three evaporation models for single-component liquid drop floating in a gaseous environment are compared: two of them rely on the widely used assumption of constant (molar or mass) density and yield an explicit formula for the evaporation rate, while the third model relieves the constant density hypothesis yielding an implicit form of the evaporation rate. The comparison is made for a relative wide range of temperature and pressure operating conditions and for three liquids: water, n-octane and n-dodecane. | |
dc.format.extent | 6 pages | en |
dc.format.medium | en | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/62038 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | HEFAT | en |
dc.rights | University of Pretoria | en |
dc.subject | Molar-and mass-based approaches | en |
dc.subject | Drop evaporation modelling | en |
dc.title | Comparison between molar- and mass-based approaches to drop evaporation modelling | en |
dc.type | Presentation | en |