dc.contributor.advisor |
Appadu, A. Rao |
en |
dc.contributor.coadvisor |
Djoko, J.K. (Jules Kamdem) |
en |
dc.contributor.postgraduate |
Gidey, Hagos Hailu |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2017-06-05T12:10:19Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2017-06-05T12:10:19Z |
|
dc.date.created |
2017-04-21 |
en |
dc.date.issued |
2016 |
en |
dc.description |
Thesis (PhD)--University of Pretoria, 2016. |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
In this PhD thesis, we construct numerical methods to solve problems described by advectiondiffusion
and convective Cahn-Hilliard equations. The advection-diffusion equation models
a variety of physical phenomena in fluid dynamics, heat transfer and mass transfer or alternatively
describing a stochastically-changing system. The convective Cahn-Hilliard equation
is an equation of mathematical physics which describes several physical phenomena such
as spinodal decomposition of phase separating systems in the presence of an external field
and phase transition in binary liquid mixtures (Golovin et al., 2001; Podolny et al., 2005).
In chapter 1, we define some concepts that are required to study some properties of numerical
methods. In chapter 2, three numerical methods have been used to solve two problems
described by 1D advection-diffusion equation with specified initial and boundary conditions.
The methods used are the third order upwind scheme (Dehghan, 2005), fourth order
scheme (Dehghan, 2005) and Non-Standard Finite Difference scheme (NSFD) (Mickens,
1994). Two test problems are considered. The first test problem has steep boundary layers
near the region x = 1 and this is challenging problem as many schemes are plagued by nonphysical
oscillation near steep boundaries. Many methods suffer from computational noise
when modelling the second test problem especially when the coefficient of diffusivity is very
small for instance 0.01. We compute some errors, namely L2 and L1 errors, dissipation
and dispersion errors, total variation and the total mean square error for both problems and compare the computational time when the codes are run on a matlab platform. We then
use the optimization technique devised by Appadu (2013) to find the optimal value of the
time step at a given value of the spatial step which minimizes the dispersion error and this
is validated by some numerical experiments.
In chapter 3, a new finite difference scheme is presented to discretize a 3D advectiondiffusion
equation following the work of Dehghan (2005, 2007). We then use this scheme
and two existing schemes namely Crank-Nicolson and implicit Chapeau function to solve a
3D advection-diffusion equation with given initial and boundary conditions. We compare the
performance of the methods by computing L2- error, L1-error, dispersion error, dissipation
error, total mean square error and some performance indices such as mass distribution ratio,
mass conservation ratio, total mass and R2 which is a measure of total variation in particle
distribution. We also compute the rate of convergence to validate the order of accuracy of
the numerical methods. We then use optimization techniques to improve the results from
the numerical methods.
In chapter 4, we present and analyze four linearized one-level and multilevel (Bousquet et al.,
2014) finite volume methods for the 2D convective Cahn-Hilliard equation with specified
initial condition and periodic boundary conditions. These methods are constructed in such
a way that some properties of the continuous model are preserved. The nonlinear terms
are approximated by a linear expression based on Mickens' rule (Mickens, 1994) of nonlocal
approximations of nonlinear terms. We prove the existence and uniqueness, convergence
and stability of the solution for the numerical schemes formulated. Numerical experiments
for a test problem have been carried out to test the new numerical methods. We compute
L2-error, rate of convergence and computational (CPU) time for some temporal and spatial
step sizes at a given time. For the 1D convective Cahn-Hilliard equation, we present
numerical simulations and compute convergence rates as the analysis is the same with the
analysis of the 2D convective Cahn-Hilliard equation. |
en_ZA |
dc.description.availability |
Unrestricted |
en |
dc.description.degree |
PhD |
en |
dc.description.department |
Mathematics and Applied Mathematics |
en |
dc.identifier.citation |
Gidey, HH 2016, Numerical solution of advection-diffusion and convective Cahn-Hilliard equations, PhD Thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/60805> |
en |
dc.identifier.other |
A2017 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/60805 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
University of Pretoria |
en |
dc.rights |
© 2017 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. |
en |
dc.subject |
UCTD |
en |
dc.title |
Numerical solution of advection-diffusion and convective Cahn-Hilliard equations |
en |
dc.type |
Thesis |
en |