dc.contributor.author |
Brand, J.F.D. (Jacobus Frederick Daniel, 1968- )
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Murcott, Melanie
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2015-08-13T08:44:54Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2015-08-13T08:44:54Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2013 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Administrative law-related cases in 2013 produced developments
relating to two general issues: the relationship between the
Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 (‘PAJA’) and
legality; and the relationship between the PAJA and labour law. In
addition, a number of more specific issues were addressed, most
notably whether our law recognises a doctrine of substantive
legitimate expectation, and issues relating to remedies on administrative
law review. |
en_ZA |
dc.description.librarian |
am2015 |
en_ZA |
dc.description.uri |
http://reference.sabinet.co.za/sa_epublication/ju_assal |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation |
Brand, D & Murcott, M 2013, 'Adminstrative law', Annual Survey of South African Law, pp. 61-90. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn |
0376-4605 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/49296 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_ZA |
dc.publisher |
Juta Law |
en_ZA |
dc.rights |
Juta Law |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 (‘PAJA’) |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Legality |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Labour law |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Courts |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Administrative law-related cases |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 (PAJA) |
en_ZA |
dc.title |
Administrative law |
en_ZA |
dc.type |
Article |
en_ZA |