Contingent valuation of community forestry programs in Ethiopia : controlling for preference anomalies in double-bounded CVM

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Gelo, Dambala
dc.contributor.author Koch, Steven F.
dc.date.accessioned 2015-06-26T07:54:57Z
dc.date.available 2015-06-26T07:54:57Z
dc.date.issued 2015-06
dc.description.abstract This study examines the welfare effects of community plantations in Ethiopia via contingent valuation. Both singlebounded and double-bounded surveymethodswere considered, and, with respect to double-boundedmethods, the potential for anomalous response behaviour was also taken into account. The results generally confirmthat there are statistically significant welfare benefits to be derived from community forestry; however, the range of the estimated benefits is large. After controlling for anomalous response behaviour, the range of estimated benefits narrows, and our preferred estimates place the welfare gain between Ethiopian Birr (ETB) 20.14 and 30.41 per household, which is much lower than the estimated benefits without controlling for anomalous preference responses. en_ZA
dc.description.embargo 2016-06-30 en_ZA
dc.description.librarian hb2015 en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Gelo, D & Koch, SF 2015, 'Contingent valuation of community forestry programs in Ethiopia : controlling for preference anomalies in double-bounded CVM', Ecological Economics, vol. 114, pp. 79-89. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 0921-8009 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1873-6106 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.014
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/45796
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Elsevier en_ZA
dc.rights © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Ecological Economics. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Ecological Economics, vol. 114, pp. 79-89, 2015. doi : 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.014 en_ZA
dc.subject Double-bounded contingent valuation en_ZA
dc.subject Shift bias en_ZA
dc.subject Anchoring bias en_ZA
dc.title Contingent valuation of community forestry programs in Ethiopia : controlling for preference anomalies in double-bounded CVM en_ZA
dc.type Postprint Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record