E versus Z isomers of Fischer aminocarbene complex [Mo(CO)4(PPh3){C(NHCy)(2-furyl)}] : Nsingle bondH⋯O versus Csingle bondH⋯O intramolecular hydrogen bonds
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Please note that UPSpace will be unavailable from Friday, 2 May at 18:00 (South African Time) until Sunday, 4 May at 20:00 due to scheduled system upgrades.
We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause and appreciate your understanding.
E versus Z isomers of Fischer aminocarbene complex [Mo(CO)4(PPh3){C(NHCy)(2-furyl)}] : Nsingle bondH⋯O versus Csingle bondH⋯O intramolecular hydrogen bonds
A density functional theory (DFT) calculated conformation analysis of the twelve possible conformations
of [Mo(CO)4(PPh3){C(NHCy)(2-furyl)}], 1, utilizing different DFT methods, showed that both the cis-syn,Z
(2), 1-Z, and the cis-syn,Z (2), 1-E, conformations of this aminocarbene complex have similar electronic
and Gibbs free energies. The solid-state crystal structure of the 1-Z is presented in this study and compared
to the structure of the 1-E conformation. The stability of 1-Z, versus the previously published
solid-state structure of conformer 1-E, is ascribed to stabilization of the NAH OFu intramolecular bond.
This is evidenced by a shorter H O intramolecular bond in the experimental crystal structure of 1-Z. The
stability of the 1-Z and 1-E conformations were analyzed and compared by density functional theory,
quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) and natural bond orbital (NBO) methods. The NBO
analysis reveals similar but stronger donor–acceptor interactions in 1-Z than in 1-E. QTAIM calculations
indicate 6 and 5 bond critical points related to intramolecular bonds stabilizing the orientation of 2-furyl
and NHCy in 1-Z and 1-E respectively.