Battle for sex?: Protecting sexual(ity) rights in Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kuwali, Dan
dc.date.accessioned 2015-03-16T10:31:24Z
dc.date.available 2015-03-16T10:31:24Z
dc.date.issued 2014-02
dc.description.abstract Most African states see permission of unconventional sexuality and recognition of same-sex marriages as “deviant” in relation to the traditional sex roles of women and men. States have invoked justifications such as “cultural sovereignty,” “protection of public morals,” “religious sanctity,” and “traditional values” as a rationalization for criminalizing queer sexuality. However, religious leadership, not the state, has the responsibility to guide the morality of individuals. Everyone should enjoy equal rights irrespective of their sexuality, including sexual orientation and sexual identity. The realization of the rights of “all people born free and equal in dignity” will require criminalizing homophobia, not homosexuality. en_ZA
dc.description.librarian hb2015 en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.press.jhu.edujournals/human_rights_quarterly/ en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Kuwali, D 2014, 'Battle for sex?: Protecting sexual(ity) rights in Africa', Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 22-60. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 0275-0392 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1085-794X (online)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/44017
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Johns Hopkins University Press en_ZA
dc.rights © 2014 Johns Hopkins University Press en_ZA
dc.subject Africa en_ZA
dc.subject Sexuality en_ZA
dc.subject Same-sex marriages en_ZA
dc.subject Queer sexuality en_ZA
dc.subject Equal rights en_ZA
dc.subject Homosexuality en_ZA
dc.title Battle for sex?: Protecting sexual(ity) rights in Africa en_ZA
dc.type Postprint Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record