Effects of essential oils, ionophore and live yeast supplementation on rumen fermentation dynamics in Jersey cows

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Erasmus, L.J. (Lourens Jacobus) en
dc.contributor.coadvisor Meeske, Robin
dc.contributor.postgraduate Meiring, Phillip en
dc.date.accessioned 2015-01-19T12:11:11Z
dc.date.available 2015-01-19T12:11:11Z
dc.date.created 2014/12/12 en
dc.date.issued 2014 en
dc.description Dissertation (MScAgric)--University of Pretoria, 2014. en
dc.description.abstract The prohibition of the use of growth promoting antibiotics in animal feeds within the European Union (EU) and some other countries has led to an increased interest in alternative means of manipulating rumen fermentation. The objectives of our study were to determine the effects of alternative natural feed additives, essential oils (EO, Oleobiotec) and rumen specific live yeast (LY, Levucell), to monensin (MO) and their effects on rumen fermentation and in sacco NDF, starch and N disappearance. The study consisted out of four rumen cannulated lactating Jersey cows that were used in a 4 x 4 Latin square design experiment. The four experimental treatments were: 1) Control (C), a lucerne hay/maize based TMR (10.7 MJ ME/kg, 17% CP, 32.1% NDF), 2) C + MO, 3) C + EO, 4) C + EO + LY. The experimental periods were 25 days with the last four days for rumen sampling and the in sacco study. Mean ruminal pH ranged between 5.80 and 6.02 and tended (P < 0.10) to be lower in the control cows compared to the other treatments. Total VFA production, acetate : propionate ratio and rumen ammonia nitrogen concentration did not differ (P > 0.05) but lactic acid concentration tended to be lower for the C + EO treatment when compared to MO supplemented cows. In sacco TMR starch disappearance after 24 hours were higher for the C + EO treatment when compared to the C and C + EO + LY treatment groups (P > 0.05). Milk production and DMI did not differ (P > 0.05) but fat % was higher for EO supplemented cows (4.52%) when compared to C cows (4.32%) (P < 0.05). Results suggest a negative interaction between the essential oil and live yeast products used in this study. More research is needed on potential complimentary effects and interactions between feed additives. en
dc.description.availability Unrestricted en
dc.description.degree MScAgric en
dc.description.department Animal and Wildlife Sciences en
dc.description.librarian lk2014 en
dc.identifier.citation Meiring, AP 2014, Effects of essential oils, ionophore and live yeast supplementation on rumen fermentation dynamics in Jersey cows, MScAgric Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/43177> en
dc.identifier.other M14/9/186 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/43177
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher University of Pretoria en_ZA
dc.rights © 2014 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. en
dc.subject UCTD en
dc.title Effects of essential oils, ionophore and live yeast supplementation on rumen fermentation dynamics in Jersey cows en
dc.type Dissertation en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record