Supercritical water-cooled nuclear reactors: thermodynamic-cycles options

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Pioro, I.
dc.contributor.author Zirn, U.
dc.contributor.author Duffey, R.
dc.contributor.author Naidin, M.
dc.contributor.author Mokry, S.
dc.contributor.author Gospodinov, Ye.
dc.contributor.author Baig, F.
dc.date.accessioned 2014-12-10T06:33:52Z
dc.date.available 2014-12-10T06:33:52Z
dc.date.issued 2008
dc.description.abstract Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics, South Africa, 30 June - 2 July, 2008. en_ZA
dc.description.abstract Currently there are a number of Generation IV SuperCritical Water-cooled nuclear Reactor (SCWR) concepts under development worldwide. The main objectives for developing and utilizing SCWRs are: 1) Increase gross thermal efficiency of current Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) from 33 – 35% to approximately 45 – 50%, and 2) Decrease the capital and operational costs and, in doing so, decrease electrical-energy costs (~$1000 US/kW or even less). SCW NPPs will have much higher operating parameters compared to current NPPs (i.e., pressures of about 25 MPa and outlet temperatures up to 625°C). Additionally, SCWRs will have a simplified flow circuit in which steam generators, steam dryers, steam separators, etc. will be eliminated. Furthermore, SCWRs operating at higher temperatures can facilitate an economical co-generation of hydrogen through thermo-chemical cycles (particularly, the copper-chlorine cycle) or direct high-temperature electrolysis. To decrease significantly the development costs of a SCW NPP, to increase its reliability, and to achieve similar high thermal efficiencies as the advanced fossil steam cycles it should be determined whether SCW NPPs can be designed with a steam-cycle arrangement that closely matches that of mature SuperCritical (SC) fossil power plants (including their SC turbine technology). The state-of-the-art SC steam cycles in fossil power plants are designed with a single-steam reheat and regenerative feedwater heating and reach thermal steamcycle efficiencies up to 54% (i.e., net plant efficiencies of up to 43% on a Higher Heating Value (HHV) Basis). Therefore, simplified no-reheat, single-reheat, and double-reheat cycles without heat regeneration and a singlereheat cycle with heat regeneration based on the expected steam parameters of future SCW NPPs were analyzed in terms of their thermal efficiencies. On this basis, several conceptual steam-cycle arrangements of pressure-tube SCWRs, their corresponding T–s diagrams and steam-cycle thermal efficiencies (based on constant isentropic turbine and polytropic pump efficiencies) are presented in this paper. en_ZA
dc.description.librarian vk2014 en_ZA
dc.format.extent 9 pages en_ZA
dc.format.medium PDF en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Poiro, I, Zirn, U, Duffey, R, Naidin, M, Mokry, S, Gospodinov, Ye & Baig, F 2008, Supercritical water-cooled nuclear reactors: thermodynamic-cycles options, Paper presented to the 6th International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics, South Africa, 30 June - 2 July 2008. en_ZA
dc.identifier.isbn 9781868546916
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/42900
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics en_ZA
dc.relation.ispartof HEFAT 2008 en_US
dc.rights University of Pretoria en_ZA
dc.subject Supercritical water cooled nuclear reactors en_ZA
dc.subject Thermodynamic cycles options en_ZA
dc.subject SCWR en_ZA
dc.subject Nuclear power plants en_ZA
dc.subject NPP en_ZA
dc.subject Single steam reheat and regenerative feedwater heating en_ZA
dc.title Supercritical water-cooled nuclear reactors: thermodynamic-cycles options en_ZA
dc.type Presentation en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record