dc.contributor.author |
Pioro, I.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Zirn, U.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Duffey, R.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Naidin, M.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Mokry, S.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Gospodinov, Ye.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Baig, F.
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-12-10T06:33:52Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-12-10T06:33:52Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2008 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics, South Africa, 30 June - 2 July, 2008. |
en_ZA |
dc.description.abstract |
Currently there are a number of Generation IV
SuperCritical Water-cooled nuclear Reactor (SCWR)
concepts under development worldwide. The main objectives
for developing and utilizing SCWRs are: 1) Increase gross
thermal efficiency of current Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs)
from 33 – 35% to approximately 45 – 50%, and 2) Decrease
the capital and operational costs and, in doing so, decrease
electrical-energy costs (~$1000 US/kW or even less).
SCW NPPs will have much higher operating parameters
compared to current NPPs (i.e., pressures of about 25 MPa
and outlet temperatures up to 625°C). Additionally, SCWRs
will have a simplified flow circuit in which steam generators,
steam dryers, steam separators, etc. will be eliminated.
Furthermore, SCWRs operating at higher temperatures can
facilitate an economical co-generation of hydrogen through
thermo-chemical cycles (particularly, the copper-chlorine
cycle) or direct high-temperature electrolysis.
To decrease significantly the development costs of a
SCW NPP, to increase its reliability, and to achieve similar
high thermal efficiencies as the advanced fossil steam cycles
it should be determined whether SCW NPPs can be designed
with a steam-cycle arrangement that closely matches that of
mature SuperCritical (SC) fossil power plants (including their
SC turbine technology). The state-of-the-art SC steam cycles
in fossil power plants are designed with a single-steam reheat
and regenerative feedwater heating and reach thermal steamcycle
efficiencies up to 54% (i.e., net plant efficiencies of up
to 43% on a Higher Heating Value (HHV) Basis).
Therefore, simplified no-reheat, single-reheat, and
double-reheat cycles without heat regeneration and a singlereheat
cycle with heat regeneration based on the expected
steam parameters of future SCW NPPs were analyzed in
terms of their thermal efficiencies.
On this basis, several conceptual steam-cycle
arrangements of pressure-tube SCWRs, their corresponding
T–s diagrams and steam-cycle thermal efficiencies (based on
constant isentropic turbine and polytropic pump efficiencies)
are presented in this paper. |
en_ZA |
dc.description.librarian |
vk2014 |
en_ZA |
dc.format.extent |
9 pages |
en_ZA |
dc.format.medium |
PDF |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation |
Poiro, I, Zirn, U, Duffey, R, Naidin, M, Mokry, S, Gospodinov, Ye & Baig, F 2008, Supercritical water-cooled nuclear reactors: thermodynamic-cycles options, Paper presented to the 6th International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics, South Africa, 30 June - 2 July 2008. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.isbn |
9781868546916 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/42900 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_ZA |
dc.publisher |
International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics |
en_ZA |
dc.relation.ispartof |
HEFAT 2008 |
en_US |
dc.rights |
University of Pretoria |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Supercritical water cooled nuclear reactors |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Thermodynamic cycles options |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
SCWR |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Nuclear power plants |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
NPP |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Single steam reheat and regenerative feedwater heating |
en_ZA |
dc.title |
Supercritical water-cooled nuclear reactors: thermodynamic-cycles options |
en_ZA |
dc.type |
Presentation |
en_ZA |