Encompassing non-legal tax practitioners in South Africa within the ambit of legal professional privilege

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Klein, A.E. (Abraham Eduard)
dc.contributor.coadvisor Terblanche, Hettie
dc.contributor.postgraduate Moodley, Kubashni
dc.date.accessioned 2014-08-12T08:46:43Z
dc.date.available 2014-08-12T08:46:43Z
dc.date.created 2014-04-01
dc.date.issued 2014 en_US
dc.description Dissertation (Mcom)--University of Pretoria, 2013. en_US
dc.description.abstract South African taxpayers currently consult either accountants (i.e., non-legal tax practitioners) or attorneys (i.e., legal tax practitioners) in order to acquire tax advice. The qualitative approach adopted in carrying out this study entails the examination of the differing rights applicable to a taxpayer depending on which adviser he decides to approach for tax advice. The concept of legal professional privilege is a common law right which has only ever been applicable to members of the legal profession. However, due to the recent regulation of tax practitioners and the modernisation of the way taxpayers conduct their financial affairs in approaching both attorneys and accountants for tax advice it seems appropriate that this privilege should be extended beyond the legal profession. Upon consideration of the history and requirements of this privilege it is determined that this privilege is amenable to extension. Constitutional principles, with regard to the right to privacy and the right to equality in relation to the taxpayer obtaining the tax advice, are infringed as a result of the limitation imposed whereby only tax advice obtained from an attorney is protected. Lastly, the current legislative stances adopted by foreign jurisdictions, that currently permit or are considering permitting legal professional privilege to apply to tax advice obtained from non-legal tax practitioners illustrate that there is a global movement toward removing the current restrictions on this principle. This has been accomplished by countries such as the United States of America and New Zealand by way of introduction of statutory provisions that allow for tax advice issued by non-legal tax practitioners to be protected from disclosure to the revenue authorities in the respective countries. Based on the research conducted it is concluded that South Africa should therefore follow suit and create a separate statutory provision to protect tax advice obtained from non-legal tax practitioners. en_US
dc.description.availability unrestricted en_US
dc.description.department Taxation en_US
dc.identifier.citation Moodley, K 2014, Encompassing non-legal tax practitioners in South Africa within the ambit of legal professional privelege. MCom dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/41183> en_US
dc.identifier.other F14/4/404/lm en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/41183
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Pretoria en_ZA
dc.rights © 2014 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. en_US
dc.subject Tax practitioners en_US
dc.subject Taxation en_US
dc.subject Legal professional privilege en_US
dc.subject Non-legal tax practitioners en_US
dc.subject Constitutional issues en_US
dc.subject UCTD en_US
dc.title Encompassing non-legal tax practitioners in South Africa within the ambit of legal professional privilege en_US
dc.type Mini Dissertation en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record