Intravenous fluid therapy : a randomized controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of the IV2TM flow medical device

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Fraser, Nesta
dc.contributor.author Snyman, Jacques Rene
dc.contributor.author Wessels, Francois
dc.contributor.author Nel, George
dc.date.accessioned 2007-12-18T06:58:56Z
dc.date.available 2007-12-18T06:58:56Z
dc.date.issued 2007-09
dc.description.abstract OBJECTIVES: To investigate the hypothetical benefits of the IV2TM flow medical device. BACKGROUND: Intravenous fluid administration is a standard hospital procedure with assumed inadequacies. The IV-Event Study [Fraser N, Nel G, Snyman J & Wessels F (2004) IV-EVENT Study: Intravenous Infusion Therapy – Management and Adverse Events. Data on File: Varori International (Pty) Ltd., Centurion, South Africa] quantified these inadequacies; The ‘Stargait’ intervention trial investigated the effectiveness and possible cost-benefit of the IV2TM flow. The IV2TM flow is intended for routine use with gravitational intravenous infusion sets. The IV2TM flow should reduce the incidence rate of adverse events and maintain a set flow rate. METHOD: Nursing staff assisted by study assessors captured relevant data. Consented patients were enrolled for the period of their prescribed infusions. INTERVENTION: The Stargait Trial compared the treatment group (standard gravitational sets with the IV2TM flow) with the control group (standard gravitational infusion sets without IV2TM flow). The difference in observed events and the cost benefit derived from this were measured. RESULTS: A total of 2387 drip hours were observed in 52 patients. The adverse event rates were: Control group (without IV2TM flow) 33.8%. The treatment group (IV2TM flow) 15.4%. This 55% reduction is statistically significant (p = 0.0069). Adverse event related monetary wastage (labour and consumables) is reduced by 76% for infusion bags in the intervention group (with IV2TM flow). There was a significant difference between the treatment group and control group as far as deviation in flow rate was concerned (p = 0.00818). The mean deviation of the IV2TM flow group was just more than 5 ml per hour. The standard line group had a mean deviation of more than 30 ml per hour. CONCLUSION: Gravitational intravenous therapy compromises quality of patient care. The Stargait Trial has proven the care-effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the IV2TM flow. en
dc.format.extent 416238 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier.citation Fraser, N, Snyman, JR, Wessels, F & Nel, G 2007, 'Intravenous fluid therapy: a randomized controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of the IV2TM flow medical device', Journal of Clinical Nursing, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1593-1601. [http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/jcn] en
dc.identifier.issn 1365-2702
dc.identifier.other 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01714.x
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/4114
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Blackwell en
dc.rights Blackwell. The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com. en
dc.subject Adverse events en
dc.subject Flow rate inaccuracy en
dc.subject Gravitational intravenous infusion sets en
dc.subject Intravenous therapy en
dc.subject Resource wastage en
dc.subject.lcsh Intravenous therapy
dc.subject.lcsh Intravenous therapy--Equipment and supplies
dc.subject.lcsh Cost effectiveness
dc.title Intravenous fluid therapy : a randomized controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of the IV2TM flow medical device en
dc.type Postprint Article en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record