dc.contributor.author |
Corcoran, Patricia L.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Bumby, Adam John
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Davis, D.W.
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-06-04T08:43:23Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-06-04T08:43:23Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2013 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Four Paleoproterozoic formations of the Waterberg Group in South Africa are composed of coarse clastic
detritus derived from erosion of the Limpopo Belt. Timing of the Limpopo orogeny, an event involving
the collision of the Kaapvaal and Zimbabwe cratons, has long been a contentious issue. The results of
point counting, major and trace element geochemistry, and U–Pb detrital zircon geochronology indicate
that the Waterberg sedimentary formations in the study area were primarily sourced by siliceous (rifted
margin) sedimentary and minor mafic volcanic rocks of the Archean Beit Bridge Complex, Limpopo Central
Zone.
The volumetrically predominant beige/brown sandstones in the four studied formations are quartzrich
with average QFR ratios of 80:7:13 (Blouberg), 70:19:11 (Setlaole), 88:5:7 (Makgabeng), and 89:3:8
(Mogalakwena). Chert and arenite account for >90% of lithic fragments in all formations, with minor
siliceous gneiss fragments. Although all formations are silica enriched, the Makgabeng dune samples
produce extremely high SiO2 abundances (92–99 wt%), which are attributed to the presence of silica
cement and quartz within rock fragments. Geochemically, the stratigraphically highest Mogalakwena
Formation is unique with elevated Ti and Zr values, and intra-formational differences in REE patterns; the
latter feature is consistent with a mixed provenance. Volumetrically minor green and purple sandstones
in the Waterberg formations contain the greatest Cr, Ni, Ti, and V abundances, which supports localized
derivation from a mafic or ultramafic source. Chemical index of alteration (CIA) values range from 57
to 89, which could indicate significant chemical weathering of the source rocks, but a plot of Th/Sc
versus Zr/Sc illustrates that the sandstones have undergone recycling, which was probably responsible
for enrichments in Al2O3 relative to Na2O3, CaO and K2O. Combinations of well rounded and subangular
quartz grains support a recycled origin. Detrital zircons in the lowermost Blouberg Formation produced a
wide array of ages ranging from ca. 3379 to 2043 Ma. The youngest peak at 2046 Ma is also the largest, and
represents the maximum age of deposition for the formation. Additional peaks at 3281 Ma, 3330 Ma, and
3379 Ma are consistent with ages previously determined from the Beit Bridge Complex, whereas peaks
at 2578 Ma and 2649 Ma coincide with ages determined from gneisses of the Limpopo Central Zone.
Derivation of detritus from the Beit Bridge Complex is directly indicated by sedimentary and siliceous
gneiss fragments in the sandstones, subrounded quartz grains suggestive of relatively short transport distances,
green and purple sandstone drapes derived from mafic volcanic units, and paleocurrent patterns
consistent with south to southwest flow directions. Therefore the timing of deposition of the Blouberg
Formation (2046 Ma) equates to the end stages of the Limpopo orogeny. This negates previous suggestions
that the Limpopo orogeny occurred only during the Neoarchean. |
en_US |
dc.description.librarian |
hb2014 |
en_US |
dc.description.uri |
http://www.elsevier.com/locate/precamres |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Corcoran, PL, Bumby, AJ & Davis, DW 2013, 'The Paleoproterozoic Waterberg Group, South Africa : provenance and its relation to the timing of the Limpopo orogeny', Precambrian Research, vol. 230, no. 6, pp. 45-60. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
0301-9268 (print) |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1872-7433 (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.1016/j.precamres.2012.12.009 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/39981 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Elsevier |
en_US |
dc.rights |
© 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Precambrian Research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Precambrian Research, vol.230, no.6, pp. 45-60. 2013. doi : 10.1016/j.precamres.2012.12.009 |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Limpopo belt |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Waterberg group |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Palaeoproterozoic |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Geochemistry |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Detrital zircon U–Pb geochronology |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Provenance |
en_US |
dc.title |
The Paleoproterozoic Waterberg Group, South Africa : provenance and its relation to the timing of the Limpopo orogeny |
en_US |
dc.type |
Postprint Article |
en_US |