We are excited to announce that the repository will soon undergo an upgrade, featuring a new look and feel along with several enhanced features to improve your experience. Please be on the lookout for further updates and announcements regarding the launch date. We appreciate your support and look forward to unveiling the improved platform soon.
dc.contributor.author | Kohler, Angela![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Pirk, Christian Walter Werner![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Nicolson, Sue W.![]() |
|
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-03-10T08:23:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-03-10T08:23:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.description.abstract | Secondary metabolites produced by plants for herbivore defence are often found in floral nectar, but their effect on the foraging behaviour and physiological performance of pollinators is largely unknown. Nicotine is highly toxic to most herbivores, and nicotine-based insecticides may contribute to current pollinator declines. We examined the effects of nectar nicotine on honeybee foraging choices and worker longevity. Free-flying honeybee (Apis mellifera scutellata) workers from six colonies were given a choice between multiple nicotine concentrations (0–1000 lM) in artificial nectar (0.15–0.63 M sucrose). The dose-dependent deterrent effect of nicotine was stronger in lower sugar concentrations, but even the highest nicotine concentrations did not completely repel honeybees, i.e. bees did not stop feeding on these diets. Nicotine in nectar acts as a partial repellent, which may keep pollinators moving between plants and enhance cross-pollination. In the second part of the study, newly emerged workers from 12 colonies were caged and fed one of four nicotine concentrations (0–300 lM) in 0.63 M sucrose for 21 days. Moderate (630 lM) nicotine concentrations had no significant detrimental effect, but high nicotine concentrations reduced the survival of caged workers and their nectar storage in the honey comb. In contrast, worker groups that survived poorly on sugar-only diets demonstrated increased survival on all nicotine diets. In the absence of alternative nectar sources, honeybees tolerate naturally occurring nectar nicotine concentrations; and low concentrations can even be beneficial to honeybees. However, high nicotine concentrations may have a detrimental effect on colony fitness. | en |
dc.description.librarian | hb2014 | en |
dc.description.librarian | ab2014 | |
dc.description.uri | http://www.elsevier.com/ locate/ jinsphys | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Köhler, A, Pirk, CWW & Nicolson, SW 2012, 'Honeybees and nectar nicotine : deterrence and reduced survival versus potential health benefits', Journal of Insect Physiology, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 286-292. | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0022-1910 (print) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1879-1611 (online) | |
dc.identifier.other | 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.12.002 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/37106 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en |
dc.rights | © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Insect Physiology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Insect Physiology, vol. 10.no. 2, pp. 286-292, 2012. doi : 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.12.002 | en |
dc.subject | Secondary metabolite | en |
dc.subject | Sucrose concentration | en |
dc.subject | Feeding preference | en |
dc.subject | Deterrence | en |
dc.subject | Nectar storage | en |
dc.subject | Apis mellifera scutellata | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Bees | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Nectar | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Nicotine | en |
dc.title | Honeybees and nectar nicotine : deterrence and reduced survival versus potential health benefits | en |
dc.type | Postprint Article | en |