Abstract Partial Deduction Challenged - (Extended Abstract)

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Gruner, Stefan
dc.date.accessioned 2014-02-03T11:53:10Z
dc.date.available 2014-02-03T11:53:10Z
dc.date.created 2002
dc.date.issued 2003
dc.description I am making my old short-paper from 2002/2003 available again here in "UPSpace" mainly because of historic interests. en_US
dc.description.abstract Experiments have been conducted in order to determine to what extent Abstract Partial Deduction can infer implicit safety properties of the well-known Bakery Protocol. en_US
dc.description.librarian mv2014 en_US
dc.description.uri http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F3-540-45013-0_19 en_US
dc.format.extent 1 p. en_US
dc.format.medium PDF en_US
dc.identifier.citation Stefan Gruner: Abstract Partial Deduction Challenged. LNCS 2664, pp. 258-259, 2003. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0302-9743
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/33233
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer-Verlag en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries LNCS en_US
dc.rights Springer-Verlag holds the copyright of the published paper as it is shown here in "UPSpace". A pre-pubished pre-print or draft-paper does no longer exist (has been lost) since then. en_US
dc.subject Logic Programming en_US
dc.subject Abstract Interpretation en_US
dc.subject Symbolic Interpretation en_US
dc.subject Abstract Partial Deduction en_US
dc.subject Regular Unary Logic en_US
dc.title Abstract Partial Deduction Challenged - (Extended Abstract) en_US
dc.type Postprint Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record