Abstract:
This article investigates the
legitimacy of a middle position between Reformed orthodoxy and critical theology. Is such a
middle position the solution to the current conflict in the Netherdutch Reformed Church of
Africa? The tension between ‘liberal’ and ‘orthodox’ is investigated by comparing these to the
alleged tension between psychology and critical exegesis in Schleiermacher’s thinking. The
article finds that these poles constituted a dialectic rather than a tension in Schleiermacher’s
thinking. An organised middle group will lead to a greater schism in the Netherdutch
Reformed Church. The argument unfolds by means of a reflection on 10 theological nuances,
the most important of which are not the poles of conservative confessionalism and critical
liberalism, but ethical-dialectical and critical-realistic theology. The conclusion is that
reconciling diversity remains a Biblical-theological imperative rather than the organisation of
an ecclesiological modality.
Description:
This article represents
a reworked version of a
memorandum compiled
at demand of the General
Commission of the General
Assembly of the Netherdutch
Reformed Church of Africa.
The article is dedicated to
Prof. Dr James Alfred Loader,
mentor of the author in
Semitic Languages.