Abstract:
Village chickens contribute considerably to the economy and to the nutritional requirements
and livelihood of many rural farmers in developing countries across the globe. The spread of
highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 into Africa during 2005/6 drew attention to the
neglect of avian disease surveillance and research in countries such as Ethiopia, in which
predominantly village chickens are reared. Several infectious and non-infectious diseases
have limited the productivity of village chickens in Ethiopia, among which Newcastle disease
(ND), caused by avian paramyxovirus serotype 1 (APMV-1), is the most important.
Newcastle disease virus (NDV) causes subclinical to severe disease depending on the virus
strain. To better understand the epidemiology of the disease, a study was performed in the
mid-Rift Valley area of Oromia region, Ethiopia, to estimate seroprevalence and incidence of
NDV exposure, identify risk factors, evaluate market trade movements and characterize
circulating NDV strains.
Repeated serological surveys in live bird markets revealed that village chickens were
concurrently seropositive for several important infectious diseases, particularly during the
wet season. The seroprevalence of ND, Pasteurella multocida infection, Mycoplasma
gallisepticum infection and infectious bursal disease virus infection were 5.9%, 66.2%,
57.7% and 91.9%, respectively, during the dry season, and 6.0%, 63.4%, 78.7% and 96.3%,
respectively, during the wet season. This underlines the need for a holistic approach to
control of infectious disease in village chickens, and further studies are warranted to better
understand the circulating strains, their interactions and their economic effect on village
poultry production.
A cross-sectional study using a multistage random sampling design with repeated sampling
periods was done in households, along with a structured questionnaire. The prevalence of
household flocks with at least one seropositive chicken was higher during the dry season
(27.4%) than during the wet season (17.4%) (P = 0.003) while the proportion of flocks in
which viral genome was detected was 24.2% and 14.2 %, respectively. The prevalence of
NDV genome detection in individual birds at markets varied from 4.9 % to 38.2, depending
on the period of sampling and the reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
technique employed. Multilevel mixed-effect logistic regression models were used to identify
risk factors for NDV seropositivity and for incidence of NDV exposure. Reduced frequency of cleaning of poultry waste, larger flock size and use of an open water source (pond or river)
for poultry were associated with increased risk of NDV exposure or seropositivity, while
maintaining a closed flock and the use of a grain supplement was associated with lower odds
of seropositivity or a lower risk of NDV exposure.
Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis, based on complete F and HN gene
sequencing, was done on NDV isolates obtained at markets and villages. The circulating
viruses had amino acid motifs characteristic of virulent strains, indicating endemic circulation
of virulent virus in village chickens which poses a threat to improvement of village chicken
production and emerging small-scale commercial poultry production. The strains clustered in
genotype VI, branching with viruses from subgenotype VIb that commonly affect pigeons,
although clustering apart on pairwise distance analysis. The apparent poor biosecurity in
village chickens and history of isolation of pigeon variant viruses from domestic chickens in
Ethiopia suggest that pigeons could play a role in the epidemiology of ND in village
chickens. Further surveillance and virus characterization is required to shed more light on
this.
Bayesian methods were used to evaluate the performance of two commercial enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (a blocking and an indirect ELISA) and
haemagglutination inhibition (HI), in the absence of a gold standard, for their ability to detect
antibodies to NDV in chicken serum from villages and live bird markets. The blocking
ELISA had the highest sensitivity (Se) of 96.3% (95% posterior credible interval (PCI): 88.1;
99.8%), and specificity (Sp) of 98.9% (95% PCI: 97.8; 99.9%), while the HI had Se of 81.6%
(95% PCI: 71.8, 91.9%), and Sp of 96.1% (95% PCI: 95.1; 96.6%). The indirect ELISA also
had high Se (95.2%; 95% PCI: 88.5; 99.0%) but had very low Sp (8.9%; 95% PCI: 6.4,
11.8%). There is therefore a need for evaluation of commercial kits before their wider use in
village chickens under field conditions.
Market trade movement patterns for live chickens were described, using social network
analysis, for two different periods during the year 2010, representing high (period one) and
low (period two) seasons for poultry trade. The study revealed that the networks exhibited
scale-free characteristics with weak connectivity of the markets and low density of the
networks. The density for the two periods was not difference (P = 0.29), although a
somewhat higher number of markets and links were observed during period one than period
two. The low density of the networks indicates that in the event of infectious disease
outbreaks in surroundings of the respective markets, the risk of its spread to many others would likely be fairly low. Nevertheless, the close similarity of NDV isolates from distant
markets in the study area suggests that markets could play a role in the spread of infectious
poultry diseases. A few markets were more central in the networks, in terms of their
betweenness and out-degree; these markets could be considered for targeted surveillance,
while those markets with high in-degree, mainly situated in the larger urban centres, can be
considered for surveillance that involves regular poultry traders.