Abstract:
The article demonstrates that the present differences Christians have in morally evaluating homosexuality in general and steady homosexual relationships in particular, can be related to the decisions they take at four pivotal crossroads. Two one-sided and opposite approaches to this evaluation that follow from different decisions at these crossroads are discussed. They are contrasted with a reforming Christian approach that would enable Christians to take a more nuanced and substantiated stance to the moral issues with regard to homosexuality.
