dc.description.abstract |
This study represents the first comprehensive analysis of gene regulation underlying the distinct categories of resistance afforded to wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.) by different Dn genes. Russian wheat aphid (Diuraphis noxia, Mordv.) feeding on susceptible wheat cultivars causes leaf rolling, chlorosis and the eventual death of the plant. Plants expressing Dn genes are resistant to D. noxia infestation, but different Dn genes afford phenotypically distinct modes of resistance: the Dn1 gene confers an antibiotic effect to lower aphid fecundity; Dn2 confers tolerance to high aphid pressure; and Dn5 confers antixenosis, and aphids do not prefer such plants as hosts. Little is known about the components involved in establishing a successful defence response against D. noxia attack and how these differ between the distinct resistance categories. It is assumed that the Dn genes function as classic R genes in plant defence, being receptors for elicitors in aphid saliva. Upon recognition, defence response signalling is initiated, but the exact mechanics of subsequent cellular events in aphid resistance have only recently come under investigation. Evidence from cDNA microarray and subtractive hybridization experiments indicated the involvement of kinase signalling cascades and photosynthetic proteins in the response against D. noxia. However, expression analysis describing how these processes differ between plants carrying different Dn genes and how these differences account for antibiosis, antixenosis or tolerance had not been conducted. We consequently investigated the downstream components involved in or affected by the generation of these resistance mechanisms by comparing the responses in transcript regulation of Tugela near-isogenic lines with different Dn genes to D. noxia infestation. cDNA-AFLP analysis was selected as an appropriate functional genomics tool, since it is semi-quantitative, does not require prior sequence information and allows for the discovery of novel genes. cDNA-AFLP analysis yielded 121 differentially regulated transcript-derived fragments (TDFs) grouped into eight expression clusters. We cloned and sequenced 49 representative TDFs, which were further classified into five broad functional categories based on inferred similarity to database sequences. Transcripts involved in such diverse processes as stress, signal transduction, photosynthesis, metabolism and gene regulation were found to be differentially regulated during D. noxia feeding. Many TDFs demonstrated homology to proteins with unknown function and several novel transcripts with no similarity to previously published sequences were also discovered. Detailed expression analysis using quantitative RT-PCR and RNA hybridization provided evidence that the time and intensity of induction of specific pathways is critical for the development of a particular mode of resistance. This includes: the generation of kinase signalling cascades and the induction of several ancillary processes such as ubiquitination, leading to a sustained oxidative burst and the hypersensitive response during antibiosis; tolerance as a passive resistance mechanism countering aphid-induced symptoms through the repair or de novo synthesis of photosystem proteins; and the possible involvement of ethylene-mediated wounding pathways in generating volatile organic compounds during antixenosis. This is the first report on the involvement of KCO1, a vacuolar K+ channel, in assisting cytosolic Ca2+-influx and preventing leaf rolling, as well as on the role of iron homeostasis as a gene regulatory mechanism for sustaining the oxidative burst during the antibiotic defence response. This study opens up several areas of investigation heretofore unexplored in cereal-aphid interaction research. Of particular interest is the induction of genes involved in photosynthetic compensation during Dn2 tolerance responses, since these constitute a novel, passive resistance mechanism exclusive to aphid defence as opposed to the active resistance triggered in the presence of the Dn1 gene in the form of a general hypersensitive response. |
en |