History of orbivirus research in South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Verwoerd, Daniel Wynand
dc.date.accessioned 2012-12-12T06:18:17Z
dc.date.available 2012-12-12T06:18:17Z
dc.date.issued 2012-11-13
dc.description Paper given at the 30th World Veterinary Congress, October 2011, Cape Town, South Africa. en
dc.description.abstract In the early colonial history of South Africa, horses played an important role, both in general transportation and in military operations. Frequent epidemics of African horsesickness (AHS) in the 18th century therefore severely affected the economy. The first scientific research on the disease was carried out by Alexander Edington (1892), the first government bacteriologist of the Cape Colony, who resolved the existing confusion that reigned and established its identity as a separate disease. Bluetongue (BT) was described for the first time by Duncan Hutcheon in 1880, although it was probably always endemic in wild ruminants and only became a problem when highly susceptible Merino sheep were introduced to the Cape in the late 18th century. The filterability of the AHS virus (AHSV) was demonstrated in 1900 by M’Fadyean in London, and that of the BT virus (BTV) in 1905 by Theiler at Onderstepoort, thus proving the viral nature of both agents. Theiler developed the first vaccines for both diseases at Onderstepoort. Both vaccines consisted of infective blood followed by hyper-immune serum, and were used for many years. Subsequent breakthroughs include the adaptation to propagation and attenuation in embryonated eggs in the case of BTV and in mouse brains for AHSV. This was followed by the discovery of multiple serotypes of both viruses, the transmission of both by Culicoides midges and their eventual replication in cell cultures. Molecular studies led to the discovery of the segmented double-stranded RNA genomes, thus proving their genetic relationship and leading to their classification in a genus called Orbivirus. Further work included the molecular cloning of the genes of all the serotypes of both viruses and clarification of their relationship to the viral proteins, which led to much improved diagnostic techniques and eventually to the development of a recombinant vaccine, which unfortunately has so far been unsuitable for mass production. en
dc.description.uri http://www.jsava.co.za en
dc.identifier.citation Verwoerd, D.W., 2012, ‘History of Orbivirus research in South Africa’, Journal of the South African Veterinary Association 83(1), Art. #532, 6 pages. http://dx.DOI. org/10.4102/jsava.v83i1.532 en
dc.identifier.issn 0038-2809 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 2224-9435 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.4102/jsava.v83i1.532
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/20679
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher OpenJournals Publishing en
dc.relation.requires Adobe Acrobat Reader en
dc.rights © 2012. The Authors. Licensee: AOSIS OpenJournals. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. en
dc.subject AHS en
dc.subject History en
dc.subject.lcsh Orbiviruses -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh African horse sickness -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Orbivirus infections in animals -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Horses -- Virus diseases en
dc.title History of orbivirus research in South Africa en
dc.type Article en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record