dc.contributor.author |
Bekker, P.M. (Petrus Thino)
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2012-12-03T13:03:59Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2013-06-30T00:20:04Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2012 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
This article is aimed at a detailed critical analysis of the basis of the integration rule in light of the current approaches to contractual liability in the South African law of contract. In light of this it will be argued that the parol evidence rule does not fit into any of the current contractual liability approaches of the South African law of contract and that, by reason of this alone, the continued recognition thereof should be seriously questioned. |
en_US |
dc.description.uri |
http://www.jutalaw.co.za/catalogue/itemdisplay.jsp?item_id=3603 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Bekker, T 2012, 'Integrasiereel in die Suid-Afrikaanse kontraktereg', Stellenbosch Law Review, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 265-279. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
1016-4359 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/20630 |
|
dc.language.iso |
Afrikaans |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Juta Law |
en_US |
dc.rights |
Juta Law |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Kontraktereg |
en_US |
dc.title |
Integrasiereel in die Suid-Afrikaanse kontraktereg |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |