dc.contributor.author |
Van Marle, Karin
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2012-10-22T06:48:20Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2012-10-22T06:48:20Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2012-08 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
In this article the author revisits Carol Smart’s 1989 publication Feminism and the power of law. She engages with Smart’s main claims by way of a number of other thinkers. Following Marianne Constable’s description of contemporary American legal thought as socio-legal, the author tentatively considers if it could be argued that some strains in contemporary legal feminism that adopted a sociological method resulted in a similar absence of justice that concerns Constable.
Smart’s caution against the development of a feminist jurisprudence is critically analysed with the benefit of hindsight. Drawing on Deleuze and Guattari, Foucault and Goodrich, the author tentatively considers the becoming of a feminist jurisprudence as a minor jurisprudence. |
en_US |
dc.description.uri |
http://www.springerlink.com/content/104213/ |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Van Marle, K 2012, 'We exist, but who are we? Feminism and the power of sociological law', Feminist Legal Studies, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 149-159, doi: 10.1007/s10691-012-9205-x. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
0966-3622 (print) |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1572-8455 (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.1007/s10691-012-9205-x |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/20246 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Springer |
en_US |
dc.rights |
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012. The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com. |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Sociological method |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Absence of justice |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Ethics of discomfort |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Minor jurisprudence |
en_US |
dc.title |
We exist, but who are we? Feminism and the power of sociological law |
en_US |
dc.type |
Postprint Article |
en_US |