The Health Systems Funding Platform : is this where we thought we were going?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Hill, Peter S .
dc.contributor.author Vermeiren, Peter
dc.contributor.author Miti, Katabaro
dc.contributor.author Oomsiti, Gorik
dc.contributor.author Van Damme, Wim
dc.date.accessioned 2012-02-13T07:40:52Z
dc.date.available 2012-02-13T07:40:52Z
dc.date.issued 2011-05-19
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND: In March 2009, the Task Force for Innovative International Financing for Health Systems recommended “a health systems funding platform for the Global Fund, GAVI Alliance, the World Bank and others to coordinate, mobilize, streamline and channel the flow of existing and new international resources to support national health strategies.” Momentum to establish the Health Systems Funding Platform was swift, with the World Bank convening a Technical Workshop on Health Systems Strengthening (HSS), and serial meetings organized to progress the agenda. Despite its potential significance, there has been little comment in peer-reviewed literature, though some disquiet in the international development community around the scope of the Platform and the capacity of the partners, which appears disproportionate to the available information. METHODS: This case study uses documentary analysis, participant observation and 24 in-depth interviews to examine the processes of development and key issues raised by the Platform. RESULTS: The findings show a fluid and volatile process, with debate over whether ongoing engagement in HSS by Global Fund and GAVI represents a dilution of organizational focus, risking ongoing support, or a paradigm shift that facilitates the achievement of targeted objectives, builds systems capacity, and will attract additional resources. Uncertainty in the development of the Platform reflects the flexibility of the recently formed global health initiatives, and the instability of donor commitments, particularly in the current financial climate. But implicit in the conflict is tension between key global stakeholders over defining and ownership of the health systems agenda. CONCLUSIONS: The tensions appear to have been resolved through a focus on national planning, applying International Health Partnership principles, though the global financial crisis and key personnel changes may yet alter outcomes. Despite its dynamic evolution, the Platform may offer an incremental path towards increasing integration around health systems, that has not been previously possible. en
dc.description.librarian nf2012 en
dc.description.sponsorship The research was funded by the European Commission through the ‘GHIs in Africa’ project (INCO-CT-2006-032371). en_US
dc.description.uri http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/ en_US
dc.identifier.citation Hill et al.: The Health Systems Funding Platform: Is this where we thought we were going? Globalization and Health 2011 7:16. en
dc.identifier.issn 1744-8603 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1744-8603 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1186/1744-8603-7-16
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/18110
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BioMed Central en_US
dc.rights © 2011 Hill et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. en
dc.subject Health systems funding platform en
dc.subject Health Systems Strengthening (HSS) en
dc.subject.lcsh National health services -- Economic aspects en
dc.subject.lcsh Public health -- International cooperation en
dc.title The Health Systems Funding Platform : is this where we thought we were going? en
dc.type Article en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record