dc.contributor.author |
Van Marle, Karin
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2011-10-06T11:05:28Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2011-10-06T11:05:28Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2010 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
In this note I discuss the case of Du Toit v Minister of Safety and Security (Du Toit). Also, although my main focus will fall on Du Toit, I refer to the recent defamation case of Robert McBride briefly. Both these cases disclose a few of the many complexities of the 'intersection' between an apartheid past and a future that is post-apartheid, particularly post-apartheid being or rather becoming. Beyond illuminating the wider questions of post-apartheid being, becoming and subjectivity, these cases also contribute to something more specific, namely the becoming of a post-apartheid jurisprudence. |
en |
dc.description.uri |
http://www.pulp.up.ac.za/cat_2009_04.html |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Van Marle, K 2010, 'Reflections on post-apartheid being and becoming in the aftermath of amnesty : Du Toit v Minister of Safety and Security', Constitutional Court Review, vol. 3, pp. 347-367. |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
2073-6215 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/17406 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Pretoria University Law Press |
en_US |
dc.rights |
© 2010 PULP (Pretoria University Law Press) All rights reserved. |
en |
dc.subject |
Du Toit v Minister of Safety and Security |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Post-apartheid era -- South Africa |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Amnesty -- South Africa |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Jurisprudence -- South Africa |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Apartheid -- South Africa |
en |
dc.title |
Reflections on post-apartheid being and becoming in the aftermath of amnesty : Du Toit v Minister of Safety and Security |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |