Should legal professional privilege be limited to exclude in-house lawyers under South African criminal law?

De Villiers, Wium P.

dc.contributor.author	De Villiers, Wium P.
dc.date.accessioned	2011-08-25T06:32:14Z
dc.date.available	2011-08-25T06:32:14Z
dc.date.issued	2011
dc.description.abstract	Many jurisdictions including the member states of the European Union, the United States of America, Canada, England and South Africa provide for legal professional privilege. These jurisdictions share a common rationale with regard to the protection of communications between lawyer and client. The rationale recognises the nature of the legal profession and its contribution to the rule of law and applies to both criminal and civil law.	en
dc.description.uri	http://www.jutalaw.co.za/catalogue/itemdisplay.jsp?item_id=3599	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	De Villiers, W 2011, 'Should legal professional privilege be limited to exclude in-house lawyers under South African criminal law?', South African Journal of Criminal Justice, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 42-51.	en
dc.identifier.issn	1011-8627
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2263/17161
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	Juta Law	en_US
dc.rights	Juta Law	en
dc.subject	Legal professional privilege	en
dc.subject	Common rationale	en
dc.subject.lcsh	Jurisdiction (International law)	en
dc.subject.lcsh	Universal jurisdiction	en
dc.subject.lcsh	Attorney and client -- South Africa	en
dc.subject.lcsh	Practice of law -- South Africa	en
dc.subject.lcsh	Criminal law -- South Africa	en
dc.subject.lcsh	Lawyers -- South Africa -- Protection	en
dc.title	Should legal professional privilege be limited to exclude in-house lawyers under South African criminal law?	en
dc.type	Article	en