dc.contributor.author |
Van Heerden, Jolandi
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Lockhat, Zarina I.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Bam, Donovan
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Fletcher, Lizelle
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Sommerville, Jaqui E.M.
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2011-08-03T06:14:27Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2011-08-03T06:14:27Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2011-06 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
BACKGROUND: Over the past four years, Steve Biko Academic
Hospital has been in the process of implementing and refining the
use of a picture archiving and communications system (PACS). As
part of a post-implementation refining process, it was necessary
to evaluate user-perceptions in order to improve on good system
qualities and correct flaws.
AIM: The aim of this study was to assess whether medical
clinicians perceived PACS as a positive adjunct to training and
teaching opportunities – specifically those opportunities related
to radiological image viewing and interpretation as part of patient
case discussions.
METHOD: Standardised questionnaires with ‘free text’ and ‘option
selection’ questions were distributed to clinicians who, as part of
their training, rotated at Steve Biko Academic Hospital (where
a PACS is in place) as well as other teaching hospitals without a
PACS. Between February 2009 and May 2009, approximately 400
questionnaires were distributed. As a result of constant academic
rotations, leave schedules of medical staff and posts vacated,
questionnaires could not be distributed to the entire target
population that was estimated to be in the region of 550 medical
clinicians (comprising senior medical students, interns, medical
officers, registrars and consultants). Of the 400 questionnaires
distributed, 189 completed questionnaires were returned.
Completion of the questionnaires was voluntary and anonymous.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Although a PACS relates specifically
to the archiving and retrieval of radiological images and reports, it
became clear from the feedback received from medical clinicians
(who are ward-based, theatre-based or clinic-based users of a
digital system) that many other factors, such as lack of adequate
hardware and sub-optimal personal IT proficiency, contributed to
some of the negative PACS-related perceptions and ‘lost teaching
opportunities’ reported. Negative comments specifically related
to PACS as a training adjunct included the frustrations associated
with PACS downtime (especially during the period in 2009
when many electrical power cuts were experienced nationwide,
resulting in network interruptions) and slow image retrieval
during peak work-flow times. The advantages of PACS as a
positive training adjunct were highlighted in the areas of multi-site
viewing and consultation, the possibility of image manipulation
and measurement tools, and better overall image quality. Clinicians
felt that their training experience was also enhanced because of
better patient follow-up made possible by access to all previous
radiological imaging of a particular patient. Of the clinicians who
completed the questionnaires, 63.5% felt that the PACS at Steve
Biko Academic Hospital contributed positively to their training by
creating more overall learning opportunities than other training
environments without a PACS. |
en_US |
dc.description.uri |
http://www.sajr.org.za/index.php/sajr |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Van Heerden, J, Lockhat, Z, Bam, D, Fletcher, L & Sommerville, J 2011, 'PACS : do clinical users benefit from it as a training adjunct?', South African Journal of Radiology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 38-41. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
1027-202X |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/16968 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Health and Medical Publishing Group |
en_US |
dc.rights |
Health and Medical Publishing Group |
en_US |
dc.subject |
PACS |
en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Radiology, Medical -- Records |
en |
dc.title |
PACS : do clinical users benefit from it as a training adjunct? |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |