dc.contributor.author |
Figueiredo, Estrela
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Moore, Gerry
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Smith, G.F. (Gideon Francois), 1959-
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2011-06-09T06:25:12Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2011-06-09T06:25:12Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2010-04 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Article 36.1 in the International code of botanical nomenclature
requires that, as from 1 January 1935, all names of new plant taxa (algae
and fossils excepted) must be accompanied by a Latin description
or diagnosis in order to be validly published. In this issue (Figueiredo
& al. in Taxon 59: 617–620) it is argued that the Latin requirement must be
removed now as it represents a relict that does not serve the purposes
for which it was originally intended. We propose that, as from the
effective date of the Melbourne Code, a diagnosis or description in
any language would suffice to effect valid publication of a plant name,
once the other Articles have been complied with. |
en |
dc.identifier.citation |
Figueiredo, E, Moore, G & Smith, GF 2010, '(115–116) Proposals to eliminate the Latin requirement for the valid publication of plant names', Taxon, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 656–666. [http://www.botanik.univie.ac.at/iapt/s_taxon.php] |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0040-0262 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/16738 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
International Association for Plant Taxonomy |
en_US |
dc.rights |
© 2009 by International Association for Plant Taxonomy |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Plant names |
en |
dc.subject |
International Code of Botanical Nomenclature, 2006 |
en |
dc.subject |
Botanical Latin |
en |
dc.subject |
Botanical nomenclature |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Plants -- Nomenclature |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Plants -- Indexes |
en |
dc.title |
(115–116) Proposals to eliminate the Latin requirement for the valid publication of plant names |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |