dc.contributor.author |
Lenhardt, Nils
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Hornung, Jens
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Hinderer, Matthias
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Böhnel, Harald
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Torres-Alvarado, Ignacis S.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Trauth, Nico
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2011-06-01T07:02:50Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2011-06-01T07:02:50Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2011-04 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Volcanic terrains such as magmatic arcs are thought to display the most
complex surface environments on Earth. Ancient volcaniclastics are
notoriously difficult to interpret as they describe the interplay between a
single or several volcanoes and the environment. The Early Miocene Tepoztla´n
Formation at the southern edge of the Transmexican Volcanic Belt belongs to
the few remnants of this ancestral magmatic arc, and therefore is thought to
represent an example of the initial phase of evolution of the Transmexican
Volcanic Belt. Based on geological mapping, detailed logging of
lithostratigraphic sections, palaeocurrent data of sedimentary features and
anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility, mapping of two-dimensional panels
from outcrop to field scale, and geochronological data in an area of ca
1000 km2, three periods in the evolution of the Tepoztla´n Formation were
distinguished, which lasted around 4 Myr and are representative of a volcanic
cycle (edifice growth phases followed by collapse) in a magmatic arc setting.
The volcaniclastic sediments accumulated in proximal to medial distances on
partly coalescing aprons, similar to volcanic ring plains, around at least three
different stratovolcanoes. These volcanoes resulted from various eruptions
separated by repose periods. During the first phase of the evolution of the
Tepoztla´n Formation (22Æ8 to 22Æ2 Ma), deposition was dominated by fluvial
sediments in a braided river setting. Pyroclastic material from small,
andesitic–dacitic composite volcanoes in the near vicinity was mostly
eroded and reworked by fluvial processes, resulting in sediments ranging
from cross-bedded sand to an aggradational series of river gravels. The second
phase (22Æ2 to 21Æ3 Ma) was characterized by periods of strong volcanic
activity, resulting in voluminous accumulations of lava and tuff, which
temporarily overloaded and buried the original fluvial system with its detritus.
Continuous build-up of at least three major volcanic centres further
accentuated the topography and, in the third phase (21Æ3 to 18Æ8 Ma), mass
flow processes, represented by an increase of debris flow deposits, became
dominant, marking a period of edifice destruction and flank failures. |
en |
dc.identifier.citation |
Lenhardt, N, Hornung, J, Hinderer, M, Böhnel, H, Torres-Alvarado, IS & Trauth, N 2011, 'Build-up and depositional dynamics of an arc front volcaniclastic complex: The Miocene Tepoztlán Formation (Transmexican Volcanic Belt, Central Mexico)', Sedimentology, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 785-823. [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-3091] |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0037-0746 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1365-3091 (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.1111/j.1365-3091.2010.01203.x |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/16679 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Wiley-Blackwell |
en_US |
dc.rights |
© 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 International Association of Sedimentologists. This article is embargoed by the publisher until April 2012. |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Facies model |
en |
dc.subject |
Lithofacies analysis |
en |
dc.subject |
Miocene |
en |
dc.subject |
Transmexican volcanic belt |
en |
dc.subject |
Volcaniclastic complex |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Facies (Geology) -- Mexico |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Lithofacies -- Mexico |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Volcanism -- Mexico |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Magmatism -- Mexico |
en |
dc.title |
Build-up and depositional dynamics of an arc front volcaniclastic complex : the Miocene Tepoztlán Formation (Transmexican Volcanic Belt, Central Mexico) |
en |
dc.type |
Postprint Article |
en |