Stillbirths : Where? When? Why? How to make the data count?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Lawn, Joy E.
dc.contributor.author Blencowe, Hannah
dc.contributor.author Pattinson, Robert Clive
dc.contributor.author Cousens, Simons
dc.contributor.author Kumar, Rajesh
dc.contributor.author Ibiebele, Ibinabo
dc.contributor.author Gardosi, Jason
dc.contributor.author Day, Louise T.
dc.contributor.author Stanton, Cynthia
dc.contributor.other Pattinson, Bob
dc.date.accessioned 2011-04-21T07:14:06Z
dc.date.available 2011-04-21T07:14:06Z
dc.date.issued 2011-04
dc.description.abstract Despite increasing attention and investment for maternal, neonatal, and child health, stillbirths remain invisible—not counted in the Millennium Development Goals, nor tracked by the UN, nor in the Global Burden of Disease metrics. At least 2·65 million stillbirths (uncertainty range 2·08 million to 3·79 million) were estimated worldwide in 2008 (≥1000 g birthweight or ≥28 weeks of gestation). 98% of stillbirths occur in low-income and middle-income countries, and numbers vary from 2·0 per 1000 total births in Finland to more than 40 per 1000 total births in Nigeria and Pakistan. Worldwide, 67% of stillbirths occur in rural families, 55% in rural sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia, where skilled birth attendance and caesarean sections are much lower than that for urban births. In total, an estimated 1·19 million (range 0·82 million to 1·97 million) intrapartum stillbirths occur yearly. Most intrapartum stillbirths are associated with obstetric emergencies, whereas antepartum stillbirths are associated with maternal infections and fetal growth restriction. National estimates of causes of stillbirths are scarce, and multiple (>35) classifi cation systems impede international comparison. Immediate data improvements are feasible through household surveys and facility audit, and improvements in vital registration, including specifi c perinatal certifi cates and revised International Classifi cation of Disease codes, are needed. A simple, programme-relevant stillbirth classifi cation that can be used with verbal autopsy would provide a basis for comparable national estimates. A new focus on all deaths around the time of birth is crucial to inform programmatic investment. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Some of the technical work for this paper during 2010 was funded through a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to the International Stillbirth Alliance secretariat for this series. JEL is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation via Saving Newborn Lives/Save the Children. CS was partly funded by the Global Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth. en_US
dc.identifier.citation Joy EL et al., Stillbirths : Where? When? Why? How to make the data count?. The Lancet (2011), doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62187-3 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0140-6736
dc.identifier.other 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62187-3
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/16343
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Stillbirths 2
dc.rights © 2011 Elsevier. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.subject Stillbirths en_US
dc.title Stillbirths : Where? When? Why? How to make the data count? en_US
dc.title.alternative Stillbirths 2 en_US
dc.type Postprint Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record