dc.contributor.author |
Roos, A-M.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Abdool, Zeelha
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Sultan, Abdul H.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Thakar, Ranee
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2011-04-01T06:16:41Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2011-04-01T06:16:41Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2011 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
AIM: To determine the accuracy and predictive value of transperineal (TPU) and endovaginal
ultrasound (EVU) in the detection of anal sphincter defects in women with obstetric anal
sphincter injuries and/or postpartum symptoms of faecal incontinence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and sixty-five women were recruited, four
women were excluded as they were seen years after their last delivery. TPU and EVU, followed
by endonanal ultrasound (EAU), were performed using the B&K Viking 2400 scanner. Sensitivity
and specificity, as well as predictive values with 95% confidence intervals, for detecting
anal sphincter defects were calculated for EVU and TPU, using EAU as the reference standard.
RESULTS: On EAU a defect was found in 42 (26%) women: 39 (93%) had an external (EAS) and
23 (55%) an internal anal sphincter (IAS) defect. Analysable images of one level of the EAS
combined with an analysable IAS were available in 140 (87%) women for EVU and in 131 (81%)
for TPU. The sensitivity and specificity for the detection of any defect was 48% (30e67%) and
85% (77e91%) for EVU and 64% (44e81%) and 85% (77e91%) for TPU, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Although EAU using a rotating endoprobe is the validated reference standard
in the identification of anal sphincter defects, it is not universally available. However while TPU
and/or EVU with conventional ultrasound probes can be useful in identifying normality, for
clinical purposes they are not sensitive enough to identify an underlying sphincter defect. |
en |
dc.description.sponsorship |
A.-M. R. was funded by the Mayday Childbirth
Charity Fund. Z.A. was provided with a research grant by the International Urogynecological Association in 2009. |
en |
dc.identifier.citation |
Roos A-M, et al., The diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal and transperineal ultrasound for detecting anal sphincter defects : the PREDICT study, Clinical Radiology (2011), doi:10.1016/j.crad.2010.11.017 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0009-9260 (print) |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1365-229X (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.1016/j.crad.2010.11.017 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/16170 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
Elsevier |
en |
dc.rights |
© 2011 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
en |
dc.subject |
Endovaginal |
en |
dc.subject |
Transperineal ultrasound |
en |
dc.subject |
Anal sphincter |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Diagnostic ultrasonic imaging |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Anus -- Diseases |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Rectum -- Prolapse |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Rotational motion |
|
dc.title |
The diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal and transperineal ultrasound for detecting anal sphincter defects : the PREDICT study |
en |
dc.type |
Postprint Article |
en |