dc.contributor.author |
Meyer, Esias E.
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2011-01-10T12:58:37Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2011-01-10T12:58:37Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2010-11 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
This article engages with the work of scholars such as Jacob Milgrom and Avi Hurvitz on
dating the Priestly text (P) in the pre-exilic period. In response to Wellhausen’s argument that
P is guilty of archaising, Milgrom and Hurvitz have always maintained that there would be
some ‘anachronistic slips’. In this article the author points out a few examples from Leviticus
which could be understood as ‘anachronistic slips’. The author also shows the difficulties one
encounters when attempting to interpret a text such as Leviticus 26 in the pre-exilic period. |
en |
dc.identifier.citation |
Meyer, E.E., 2010, ‘Dating the Priestly text in the preexilic period: Some remarks about anachronistic slips and other obstacles’, Verbum et Ecclesia 31(1), Art. #423, 6 pages. DOI: 10.4102/ve.v31i1.423. [www.ve.org.za] |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
1609-9982 |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.4102/ve.v31i1.423 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/15582 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
OpenJournals Publishing |
en_US |
dc.rights |
© 2010. The Authors.
Licensee: OpenJournals
Publishing. This work
is licensed under the
Creative Commons
Attribution License. |
en |
dc.subject |
Anachronistic slips |
en |
dc.subject |
Holiness code |
en |
dc.subject |
Kaufmann school |
en |
dc.subject |
Leviticus 26 |
en |
dc.subject |
Priestly text |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Errors and blunders, Literary |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Bible -- O.T. -- Leviticus XXVI -- Criticism, Textual |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
P document (Biblical criticism) |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Manuscript dating |
en |
dc.title |
Dating the Priestly text in the pre-exilic period : some remarks about anachronistic slips and other obstacles |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |