Making stillbirths count, making numbers talk - Issues in data collection for stillbirths

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Froen, J. Frederik
dc.contributor.author Gordijn, Sanne J.
dc.contributor.author Abdel-Aleem, H.
dc.contributor.author Bergsjo, P.
dc.contributor.author Betran, A.
dc.contributor.author Duke, Charles W.
dc.contributor.author Fauveau, V.
dc.contributor.author Flenady, Vicky
dc.contributor.author Hinderaker, Sven Gudmund
dc.contributor.author Hofmeyr, G. Justus
dc.contributor.author Jokhio, A.H.
dc.contributor.author Lawn, Joy E.
dc.contributor.author Lumbiganon, P.
dc.contributor.author Merialdi, Mario
dc.contributor.author Pattinson, Robert Clive
dc.contributor.author Shankar, A.
dc.contributor.other Pattinson, Bob
dc.date.accessioned 2010-11-09T09:31:51Z
dc.date.available 2010-11-09T09:31:51Z
dc.date.issued 2009-12
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND: Stillbirths need to count. They constitute the majority of the world's perinatal deaths and yet, they are largely invisible. Simply counting stillbirths is only the first step in analysis and prevention. From a public health perspective, there is a need for information on timing and circumstances of death, associated conditions and underlying causes, and availability and quality of care. This information will guide efforts to prevent stillbirths and improve quality of care. DISCUSSION: In this report, we assess how different definitions and limits in registration affect data capture, and we discuss the specific challenges of stillbirth registration, with emphasis on implementation. We identify what data need to be captured, we suggest a dataset to cover core needs in registration and analysis of the different categories of stillbirths with causes and quality indicators, and we illustrate the experience in stillbirth registration from different cultural settings. Finally, we point out gaps that need attention in the International Classification of Diseases and review the qualities of alternative systems that have been tested in low- and middle-income settings. SUMMARY: Obtaining high-quality data will require consistent definitions for stillbirths, systematic population-based registration, better tools for surveys and verbal autopsies, capacity building and training in procedures to identify causes of death, locally adapted quality indicators, improved classification systems, and effective registration and reporting systems. en_US
dc.identifier.citation Froen, JF, Gordijn, SJ, Abdel-Aleem, H, Bergsjo, P, Betran, A, Duke, CW, Fauveau, V, Flenady, V, Hinderaker, SG, Hofmeyr, GJ, Jokhio, AH, Lawn, J., Lumbiganon, P, Merialdi, M, Pattinson, R & Shankar, A 2009, 'Making stillbirths count, making numbers talk - Issues in data collection for stillbirths', BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol. 9, no. 58, pp. 1-17. [http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcpregnancychildbirth/] en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1471-2393
dc.identifier.other 10.1186/1471-2393-9-58
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/15228
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BioMed Central en_US
dc.rights © 2009 Froen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This Is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. en_US
dc.subject Stillbirths en_US
dc.subject Data collection for stillbirths en_US
dc.title Making stillbirths count, making numbers talk - Issues in data collection for stillbirths en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record