dc.contributor.upauthor |
Van Eck, Ernest
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2010-03-19T09:42:32Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2010-03-19T09:42:32Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2004 |
|
dc.description |
Spine cut of Journal binding and pages scanned on flatbed EPSON Expression 10000 XL; 400dpi; text/lineart - black and white - stored to Tiff
Derivation: Abbyy Fine Reader v.9 work with PNG-format (black and white); Photoshop CS3; Adobe Acrobat v.9
Web display format PDF |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
In this article the understanding of the resurrection of Jesus by William Lane Craig, Gerd Lüdemann and John Dominic Crossan are used as starting point to discuss two issues with regard to the study of the resurrection of Jesus: the relationship between presuppositions and results in a theological enterprise, and the nature of the texts in the New Testament as either theology or as history. Attention is also given to the notion history as such. Finally, a thesis of the resurrection of Jesus as being historically probable, is postulated. |
en |
dc.description.uri |
http://explore.up.ac.za/record=b1001341 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Van Eck, E 2004, 'Die opstanding van Jesus Christus as historiese gebeure : The resurrection as historical event', HTS Teologiese Studies/ Theological Studies, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 1173-1200.[http://www.hts.org.za/index.php/HTS/issue/archive] |
af |
dc.identifier.issn |
0259-9422 (print) |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/13625 |
|
dc.language.iso |
Afrikaans |
af |
dc.publisher |
Faculty of Theology, University of Pretoria |
en_US |
dc.rights |
Faculty of Theology, University of Pretoria |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Historical Jesus |
en |
dc.subject |
Resurrection of Christ |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Jesus Christ -- Resurrection -- Biblical teaching |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Bible -- Historiography |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Bible -- History of Biblical events |
en |
dc.title |
Opstanding van Jesus Christus as historiese gebeure |
af |
dc.type |
Article |
af |