Abstract:
The South African Government announced, in the 2008 Budget Review, the intention to tax the generation of electricity from non-renewable sources with 2c/kWh. This tax is to be collected by the producers/generators of electricity at the source. The intention of the tax is to serve a dual purpose of managing the potential electricity shortages in South Africa and to
protect the environment. The primary objective of this paper is to evaluate the impact of an
electricity generation tax on the international competitiveness of South Africa. Specifically,
different scenarios are assessed to establish whether the loss of competitiveness can be
negated through an international, multilateral electricity generation tax. The paper firstly considers the beneficial impact of environmental taxation on the competitiveness of a country. We subsequently apply the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) model to evaluate the impact of an electricity generation tax on the competitiveness
of South Africa, given multilateral taxes on SACU, SADC and European Union economies. We simulate the proposed tax as a 10 percent increase in the output price of electricity. We
assume a closure rule that allows unskilled labour to migrate between sectors and a limited
skilled workforce. As expected, a unilateral electricity generation tax in South Africa will
adversely affect the competitiveness of the South African economy and slightly improve the
competitiveness of the other SACU and SADC economies. However, if a multilateral tax is imposed throughout the SACU and SADC countries, South Africa will experience a marginally greater loss of competitiveness compared to a unilateral
tax. At the same time the rest of the SACU and SADC countries will experience a loss of
competitiveness. The benefit of emission reduction in South Africa will also be lower under
these multilateral tax scenarios. The competitiveness effect on the South African economy as well as emission reduction will be more moderate under a multilateral South Africa/EU
electricity generation tax than under a unilateral South African tax.
