Psalm 69:36c-37b : a reinterpretation of a deuteronomic-deuteronomistic formula?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.upauthor Groenewald, Alphonso, 1969-
dc.date.accessioned 2010-02-10T11:15:14Z
dc.date.available 2010-02-10T11:15:14Z
dc.date.issued 2003
dc.description Spine cut of Journal binding and pages scanned on flatbed EPSON Expression 10000 XL; 400dpi; text/lineart - black and white - stored to Tiff Derivation: Abbyy Fine Reader v.9 work with PNG-format (black and white); Photoshop CS3; Adobe Acrobat v.9 Web display format PDF en_US
dc.description.abstract In Psalm 69:36c-37b reference is made to the deuteronomic-deuteronomistic formula “yrš ‘rs” (i e possession of the land). A reinterpretation of this formula in these verses is proposed. The promise regarding the possession of the land is not made to the whole of Israel, as is the case in Deuteronomistic literature, but, instead, possession of the land is promised only to the “offspring of the servants”, in other words “those who love his name”, the pious, the community of the “servants”. The aim of this article is to deal with the issue of the “possession of the land” in Psalm 69:36c-37b in more detail. en
dc.description.uri http://explore.up.ac.za/record=b1001341 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Groenewald, A 2003, 'Psalm 69:36c-37b: A reinterpretation of a deuteronomic-deuteronomistic formula?', HTS Teologiese Studies/ Theological Studies, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 1187-1198.[http://www.hts.org.za/index.php/HTS/issue/archive] en
dc.identifier.issn 0259-9422 (print)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/12996
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Faculty of Theology, University of Pretoria en_US
dc.rights Faculty of Theology, University of Pretoria en_US
dc.subject Psalm 69:36c-37b en
dc.subject.lcsh Bible -- O.T. -- Psalms LXIX, 36c-37b -- Criticism, interpretation, etc. en
dc.subject.lcsh Land tenure -- Religious aspects en
dc.subject.lcsh Landowners en
dc.subject.lcsh Deuteronomistic history (Biblical criticism) en
dc.title Psalm 69:36c-37b : a reinterpretation of a deuteronomic-deuteronomistic formula? en
dc.type Article en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record