Hermeneutical paradoxes in the trial of Socrates

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ladikos, Anastasios
dc.contributor.author South African Society for Greek Philosophy and the Humanities
dc.date.accessioned 2009-10-20T07:51:36Z
dc.date.available 2009-10-20T07:51:36Z
dc.date.issued 2003
dc.description Appears in Phronimon, Volume 4 Number 1(2003) en
dc.description.abstract The logical role of the paradox is not to state a truth whose paradoxical nature lies in the difficulty we feel in maintaining it as true, but rather to state something that will cause fo feel as false something else we previously believed to be true. The Socratic paradox, sometimes called the "moral paradox, " is convincing and true because it implicitly raises the question about the true good. The drama of Socrates' trial and death indeed illustrates a dilemma, in which on the one hand the philosopher cannot accept the way of life prescribed by his tradition but on the other hand cannot offer an unquestionable alternative to it. The best approach to the Socratic problem is an eclectic one, using all the ancient sources instead of championing a single author at the expense of the rest. en
dc.description.uri http://explore.up.ac.za/record=b1411260 en
dc.format.extent 8 Pages en
dc.identifier.citation Ladikos, A 2003, 'Hermeneutical paradoxes in the trial of Socrates', Phronimon, vol. 4, no. 1, pp.62-69. en
dc.identifier.issn 1561-4018
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/11524
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher South African Society for Greek Philosophy and the Humanities en
dc.rights South African Society for Greek Philosophy and the Humanities en
dc.subject.lcsh Hermeneutics en
dc.subject.lcsh Paradoxes en
dc.subject.lcsh Socrates -- Trials, litigation, etc. en
dc.subject.lcsh Truth en
dc.title Hermeneutical paradoxes in the trial of Socrates en
dc.type Article en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record