Abstract:
To provide protection against harm caused by defective, unsafe products and to promote product safety,
the law of product liability has developed as a specialized area of the law of delict (tort). The vexing
question is, who should bear such liability? This contribution interrogates the notorious EU development risk defence, which exonerates manufacturers that meet certain stringent requirements for undiscoverable development risks in products that consequently inflict harm on consumers. In particular, it
considers the election by South Africa, which recently adopted a “strict” product liability regime with
the introduction of the Consumer Protection Act 2008, not to adopt such a defence. The purpose of this
contribution is to consider the nature and scope of the development risk defence as contained in article
7(e) of the European Union (EU) Product Liability Directive and to determine whether it was prudent
for South Africa to steer clear of incorporating a similar defence in its new statutory product liability
regime.
