dc.contributor.author |
Ramudingana, Phathutshedzo
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Makhado, Ndivhuho
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Kamutando, Casper Nyaradzai
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Thantsha, Mapitsi Silvester
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Mamphogoro, Tshifhiwa Paris
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2025-03-13T06:49:40Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2025-03-13T06:49:40Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2025-01 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Postharvest decay of vegetables and fruits presents a significant threat confronting sustainable food production worldwide, and in the recent times, applying synthetic fungicides has become the most popular technique of managing postharvest losses. However, there are concerns and reported proofs of hazardous impacts on consumers’ health and the environment, traceable to the application of chemical treatments as preservatives on fresh produce. Physical methods, on the other hand, cause damage to fresh produce, exposing it to even more infections. Therefore, healthier and more environmentally friendly alternatives to existing methods for managing postharvest decays of fresh produce should be advocated. There is increasing consensus that utilization of biological control agents (BCAs), mainly fungi, represents a more sustainable and effective strategy for controlling postharvest losses compared to physical and chemical treatments. Secretion of antifungal compounds, parasitism, as well as competition for nutrients and space are the most common antagonistic mechanisms employed by these BCAs. This article provides an overview of (i) the methods currently used for management of postharvest diseases of fresh produce, highlighting their limitations, and (ii) the use of biocontrol agents as an alternative strategy for control of such diseases, with emphasis on fungal antagonists, their mode of action, and, more importantly, their advantages when compared to other methods commonly used. We therefore hypothesize that the use of fungal antagonists for prevention of postharvest loss of fresh produce is more effective compared to physical and chemical methods. Finally, particular attention is given to the gaps observed in establishing beneficial microbes as BCAs and factors that hamper their development, particularly in terms of shelf life, efficacy, commercialization, and legislation procedures. |
en_US |
dc.description.department |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology (BGM) |
en_US |
dc.description.librarian |
hj2024 |
en_US |
dc.description.sdg |
SDG-03:Good heatlh and well-being |
en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship |
The Department of Agriculture in collaboration with Agricultural Research Council of South Africa. |
en_US |
dc.description.uri |
https://www.mdpi.com/journal/jof |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Ramudingana, P.; Makhado, N.; Kamutando, C.N.; Thantsha, M.S.; Mamphogoro, T.P. Fungal Biocontrol Agents in the Management of Postharvest Losses of
Fresh Produce—A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Fungi 2025, 11, 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11010082. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
2309-608X (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.3390/jof11010082 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/101462 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
MDPI |
en_US |
dc.rights |
© 2025 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license
(https://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by/4.0/). |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Biological control agents |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Postharvest loss reduction (PHLR) |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Fungal antagonist |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Fresh produce |
en_US |
dc.subject |
SDG-02: Zero hunger |
en_US |
dc.title |
Fungal biocontrol agents in the management of postharvest losses of fresh produce-a comprehensive review |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |