The potential area of occupancy of non-native plants across a warming high-Arctic archipelago : implications for strategic biosecurity management

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Speed, James D.M.
dc.contributor.author Pertierra, Luis R.
dc.contributor.author Westergaard, Kristine B.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-02-26T07:02:01Z
dc.date.available 2025-02-26T07:02:01Z
dc.date.issued 2024-06-06
dc.description SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL : Explanation note: TABLE S1. References with species-specific strings and permanent links for each of the studied 27 non-native plant species’ ecological impact assessments. TABLE S2. The total area of potential occupancy (km2) of the 27 non-native species across the Svalbard archipelago under current and future (SSP 2-45 and 5-85) climate scenarios (data from Fig. 2, also see figs S8, S11 and S12 for the corresponding maps). FIGURE S1. GBIF spatial occurrence records downloaded for the plant species used in the study (GBIF.org, 2023a). FIGURE S2. The number of GBIF spatial occurrence records across the world for vascular plants (Tracheophyta) per 2.5’ grid cell, used as a bias weighting in sampling pseudo-absences (GBIF.org, 2023b). FIGURE S3. Pearson correlation matrix used to evaluate the colinearity of the 19 global bioclimate variables and select the five representative macroclimate variables used for the distribution modelling. FIGURE S4. Evaluation statistics of the models predictive performance across all species. FIGURE S5. Evaluation statistics (TSS and ROC) of the models predictive performance plotted against the number of occurrence records per species. FIGURE S6. Variable importances of the macroenvironmental predictors estimated across modelling methods and replicates for each species and bioclimatic variable. FIGURE S7. Response curves to the five macroenvironmental predictors per species and model algorithm. FIGURE S8. Thresholded binary species predictions of potential distribution under the current climate conditions. FIGURE S9. Model predictions for each species potential distribution under future climate (SSP2-45, 2061-2080). FIGURE S10. Model predictions for each species potential distribution under future climate (SSP5-85, 2061-2080). FIGURE S11. Thresholded model predictions for each species local potential distribution under future climate (SSP5-45, 2061-2080). FIGURE S12. Thresholded model predictions for each species local potential distribution under future climate (SSP5-85, 2061-2080). FIGURE S13. Species associations within the assemblage clusters under current and future scenarios (the clustering was independent within each time period so the cluster number is not comparable between scenarios). en_US
dc.description.abstract The terrestrial high-Arctic has, so far, escaped the worst impacts of non-native plant establishment. However, increasing human activity and changing climate raise the risk of introductions and establishment, respectively. The lack of biosecurity in the terrestrial Arctic is thus of concern. To facilitate the development of biosecurity measures on the rapidly warming and highly trafficked archipelago of Svalbard, we generated ecological niche models to map the bioclimatic niche potential of 27 non-native established or door-knocker vascular plant species across Svalbard, identify species with a high risk of widespread occupancy, and locate hotspots of potential current and future invasions. Under the current climate the three species with the highest threat in terms of broad potential area of occupancy and known invasion potential were Deschampsia cespitosa, Ranunculus subborealis subsp. villosus and Saussurea alpina. However, under future climate, most of the considered species have potentially wide distributions across the archipelago. Remote eastern islands were a hotspot region for broader potential establishment of non-native species under the current climate. Our results suggest that many non-native plant species have a broader macroclimatic niche on Svalbard than they currently occupy, and that other factors probably limit both dispersal and establishment outside their current localised distributions. Environmental management on Svalbard has a limited window of opportunity to act early in containing and preventing the spread of non-native plant species beyond the few settlements where they currently exist. Moreover, preventing introductions and establishments on the remote and rarely visited islands of Edgeøya, Barentsøya and Bjørnøya could be also a priority action to safeguard sanctuaries of the archipelago’s natural ecosystems. en_US
dc.description.department Plant Production and Soil Science en_US
dc.description.librarian am2024 en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-13:Climate action en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-15:Life on land en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The BiodivERsA project ASICS (Assessing and mitigating the effects of climate change and biological Invasions on the spatial redistribution of biodiversity in Cold environments), co-funded by the Research Council of Norway; supported by the South African National Research Foundation and a Millenium BASE contract. en_US
dc.description.uri https://neobiota.pensoft.net/ en_US
dc.identifier.citation Speed, J.D.M., Pertierra, L.R. & Westergaard, K.B. (2024) The potential area of occupancy of non-native plants across a warming high-Arctic archipelago: Implications for strategic biosecurity management. NeoBiota 93: 157–175. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.114854. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1619-0033 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1314-2488 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.3897/neobiota.93.114854
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/101222
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Pensoft Publishers en_US
dc.rights © James D. M. Speed et al. This is an open access article distributed under terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. en_US
dc.subject Bioclimate en_US
dc.subject Climate change en_US
dc.subject Distribution en_US
dc.subject Neophyte en_US
dc.subject Svalbard en_US
dc.subject Tundra en_US
dc.subject SDG-13: Climate action en_US
dc.subject SDG-15: Life on land en_US
dc.title The potential area of occupancy of non-native plants across a warming high-Arctic archipelago : implications for strategic biosecurity management en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record