Active versus passive learning : comparative case study of problem-solving competencies in stoichiometry

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mamombe, Charles
dc.contributor.author Mathabathe, Kgadi
dc.date.accessioned 2025-01-21T05:12:59Z
dc.date.available 2025-01-21T05:12:59Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.description DATA AVAILABITY STATEMENT: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author. en_US
dc.description.abstract Teaching methods can help learners to develop problem-solving skills and enhance their achievement in stoichiometry. Process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) is one of the teaching methods that promote problem-solving skills because it provides opportunities for learners to work with many formulae through many steps in solving problems such as stoichiometric calculations of number of moles and concentration of solutions. To understand how POGIL can improve learners’ achievement and develop problem-solving skills, four grade 11 physical sciences classes of mixed gender and multicultural black learners were purposefully and conventional sampled from four different township schools in Pretoria, South Africa. Through pre- and post-test case study and lesson observations, two different independent groups (POGIL group and lecture group) were included in the study. POGIL group constituted 48 students, while lecture group 62 students taught by their respective teachers at their schools for three weeks using English second language. The results from the pre-test suggest that learners in all the four classes lacked problem-solving competencies in solving both the low-order and the high-order stoichiometry questions. According to the research interpretation, lesson observations of POGIL were active learning while lecture method was passive learning. The post-test results indicate statistically significant greater problem-solving competencies in POGIL group than in the lecture group. The study recommends the use of POGIL in teaching stoichiometry. en_US
dc.description.department Science, Mathematics and Technology Education en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-04:Quality Education en_US
dc.description.uri http://www.ejmste.com en_US
dc.identifier.citation Mamombe, C., and Mathabathe, K. C. (2024). Active versus passive learning: Comparative case study of problem-solving competencies in stoichiometry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(6), em2455. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14594. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1305-8223 (online)
dc.identifier.issn 1305-8215 (print)
dc.identifier.other 10.29333/ejmste/14594
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/100201
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Modestum LTD en_US
dc.rights © 2024 by the authors; licensee Modestum. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). en_US
dc.subject Stoichiometry en_US
dc.subject Active learning en_US
dc.subject Problem-solving competency en_US
dc.subject Lecture method en_US
dc.subject SDG-04: Quality education en_US
dc.subject Process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) en_US
dc.title Active versus passive learning : comparative case study of problem-solving competencies in stoichiometry en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record